They KNEW - The REAL case against Fauci et al
We don’t need to know the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to know the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic
BLUF: We don’t need to know the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to know the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic.
-The leading global public health officials knew SARS-CoV-2 bore the hallmarks of engineering/manipulation
-They specifically suppressed all ties pointing to this truth, to protect themselves
-The collateral damage from these decisions was massive, and continues as ‘long COVID’ & other sequelae
-The conclusions that follow are supported by evidence regardless of whether the virus is natural or not - or who made the SARS-CoV-2 virus, or why.
The Myth of the Blind Watchmaker argument centers upon the response to the ‘novel’ virus
[A direct video breakdown that follows the same order can be found within this stream, from 2:03:00 - 3:05:30]
I am a member of DRASTIC,
Last fall, I signed an affadavit with 4 others,submitted to each state's attorney general.
I will soon provide testimony under oath in support of grand jury proceedings to hold US and international officials & organizations responsible for actions taken before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, which constitute crimes against humanity.
This post lays out many of the conclusions formed through my research.
The ‘Watchmaker’ argument in this document summarizes the evidence and implications of Dr. Anthony Fauci's scientific censorship, narrative control and obstruction of justice upon the initial expansion and ultimate scale of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the collateral damage which was knowingly inflicted upon the American citizens he swore an oath to protect. Ultimately, it provides evidentiary support for why Pradhan et al was so viciously attacked, what it was that Fauci and Jeremy Farrar et al sought to hide [the Furin cleavage site and significant SARS-CoV-2 – HIV genomic homology] and how enforcing those decisions led to tragic consequences for humanity.
My findings and conclusions on Fauci’s scientific censorship, the similarities between the SARS-CoV-2 genome & epitopes from prior vaccine designs, and how these threads interconnect are based on several thousand hours of individual research. Most of the findings related to the HIV inserts in general, gp120, the furin cleavage site [FCS] and other aspects of the SARS-CoV-2 genome are the product of those listed above, or others referenced in the endnotes.
The implications are profound, and profoundly disturbing; the scale of the response to the 1st & 2nd drafts and livestreams [#2] have clearly shown me that my intuition about their importance was correct. I’ve published them here, now, because the evidence has become so overwhelming that I can’t, in good conscience, withhold these conclusions from the public.
Major conclusions of the 'Watchmaker' hypothesis:
- Dr. Fauci & others knew, based upon the suspicious elements of the SARS-CoV-2 genome, that the virus had almost certainly been manipulated; they knew that such manipulations likely came from chimaeric/pseudovirus & insertion techniques very familiar to US & Chinese viral vaccine & therapeutic/MCM programs.
- The 2/1 teleconference hosted by Fauci & Jeremy Farrar was convened specifically in response to the publication of the Pradhan et al pre-print and the growing awareness of the furin cleavage site [FCS].
- They immediately took steps to censor and control public & scientific discussions related to the HIV inserts and FCS, respectively; these actions are more properly viewed as obstruction of justice.
- Many of the scientists implicated in Fauci’s gain-of-function [GOF] research or the pandemic origin cover-up were also involved in earlier origin-narrative efforts for HIV-1, Gulf War Syndrome& the 2014 Ebola epidemic in West Africa, including 4 of 5 authors of “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2.”
- Beginning on 2/3/2020, President Trump's science advisor and OSTP director, Kelvin Droegemeier, worked with Fauci to withhold information about US GOF research ties with the WIV from the Trump administration.
- This had major implications for both the early response to the pandemic [FCS], ongoing treatment protocols, and the long-term impact on global public health [the HIV inserts & ‘Long COVID’ sequelae/antibody class-switching, etc].
The Early Response - Protecting the legacy, not the public’s health
- Dr. Fauci & his Vaccine Research Center [VRC, with Moderna] finished their vaccine prototype on 1/13/2020,and knew of the FCS one week before human-to-human transmission was confirmed by China. Thus, they knew that the virus was infectious enough to cause a pandemic – yet took steps to suppress this information for two months – until they could control the narrative via "Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2." The 2/1 teleconference attendees authored 33 papers/articles during that same two-month period, never mentioning the FCS. These actions intentionally enabled the largely unhindered spread of COVID-19:
- Dr. Fauci and his VRC's decision to retain the FCS within their vaccine prototype goes against more than two decades of HIV, Flu,RSV and coronavirus vaccine research and development practices; I went through 49 vaccine studies to confirm this trend:
- HIV-1 like elements in the SARS-COV-2 genome are very similar in form and function to current HIV vaccine templates [Conserved epitopes, mosaic, consensus, multi-clade, etc.] EXCEPT that the 'bad' parts were retained [the FCS, prion-like domains, DC-SIGN receptors, etc]. Once again, these are antithetical to modern vaccine design:
- For these and other reasons, the SARS-CoV-2 virus does not appear to be a failed vaccine prototype [Live Attenuated Vaccine/LAV, etc].
- Dr. Fauci & most global public health officials ignored aerosol transmission, even after the disappearance of the flu & failure of lockdowns/masks. Their actions may have fueled the rise and impact of the Delta variant.
- Dr. Fauci actively worked to suppress any links between SARS-CoVs & HIV-1, including a class of drugs Robert Garry & Bill Gallaher had helped invent – fusion peptide inhibitors. He blocked many other proven or promising treatments as well, like hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin D, protease inhibitors, and antibiotics.
The Collateral Damage - Reaping what Fauci has sown
- The SARS-COV-2 genome is mutating at unnatural rates in precisely the areas of the suspicious inserts - exactly what you would see in a virus attempting to return to its natural state [Part of Montagnier & Perez's argument, elucidated by Fleming, now born out undeniably]:
- The immune isotype IgG4 class-switching that has emerged within vaccinees who received mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccinations is very similar to effects seen in certain previous HIV vaccine trials; the HIV-like inserts within SARS-CoV-2 resemble parts of the gp120 protein in HIV, which drove the unusual IgG4 responses in that earlier trial.
- Broad immune-suppression, especially amongst the vaccinated, is now fueling exponential rises in early and/or fast-onset cancers & amyloid neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s & Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease.
- The combined immune-dysregulation effects of furin, DC-SIGN, ENaC & the SEB-like superantigen motif may also explain how SARS-CoV-2 can spread via aerosol transmission. The unprecedented & consecutive overlapping of the SEB/FCS/ENaC elements exponentially increases SARS-CoV-2’s ability to infect human lungs.
- Many of the features listed above have direct ties to historical bioweapons research, in the US and abroad. Superantigens including SEB were stockpiled as part of the US offensive bioweapons program until its closure by President Nixon in 1969.Furin Cleavage Sites are even more ubiquitous, in all the wrong places/viruses:
- The FCS, HIV-like inserts, immune dysregulation and chimaeric viral construction were four key features that were described as project goals within the DEFUSE proposal that EcoHealth Alliance submitted to DARPA in March 2018. Neither Dr. Fauci nor the US intelligence community disclosed this proposal in testimony or in the “Biden Report” on the origin of SARS-CoV-2; they covered up what is in fact proof of intent to produce a virus much like the one that caused the COVID-19 pandemic:
These conclusions indicate that the potential human costof Dr Fauci's pandemic decisions to suppress information about the FCS and other inserts may exceed that of President Franklin Roosevelt's decision to call for declarations of war against Japan and Germany in World War II.
Without hesitation, I will testify under oath to the veracity of the evidence in support of these conclusions. They involve implications that are horrific regardless of which scientists, from which country, may have been responsible for creating SARS-CoV-2; [their] actions constitute crimes against humanity. I propose the list of questions that follows on behalf of the victims of the COVID-19 pandemic, who cannot ask them themselves. I promise you, however, that all of them are waiting to hear the answers.
Charles H. Rixey
“We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark. The real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light.”
This remains my only source of income, so… I’ll never mandate paid subscription*
*..but I won’t turn down donations via subscription.* Every donation means another spike protein of justice, riding a lipid nanoparticle across the blood-brain barrier of the bureaucracy.
[*in my fight against the mortgage mandate]
SUBSCRIBE NOW. Alternatively, if you despise the shackles of Substack’s limited subscription options, you can donate any amount you want via Paypal @SARSCoVRix
This is almost certainly what is described within the classified DOE report, as I discussed at length last week.
Additionally, see Robert Garry’s Congressional Testimony, submitted 12/21/2001.
“We DO NOT make flu vaccines with that motif…” [YouTube clip]
For another example, see Welcome to Gilead, an article by Arkmedic looking at spike translocation to the cell nucleus and its interruption of DNA damage repair.
This assertion only includes American citizens.
The exact WWII number is 405,399.
Great job! you might like to complete your research with :
The REAL COVID timeline:
NOT what you were drilled
Bio-BOMB, not “vaccine”, not “gene-therapy”
This 5th gen war, includes a war on semantics.
What do bioweapons have to do with the Department of Energy?
Anybody answering these questions PLEASE ? !!!
I'm about to add this:
French masons step in
23 February 2017. Why would freemason-buddy 1 French-prime minister Bernard Cazeneuve cut the ribbon of the lab invited by lab director Zhiming Yuan?2 Tourism or planning? A person without any scientific training like Cazeneuve gains no insight from visiting a lab, especially when they chose what to show and what not.
“More than 100 people from different administrative entities including CAS, China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment (CNAS), Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China and French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) that have participated in the entire program on Sino-French Cooperation.“ Not only for viral research but also for antivirals and vaccines (they needed the cure before the bioweapon release).
Yuan said “China is positively undertaking the responsibility and obligation to ensure global public health security.” (note: China never offered to pay for the infinite pandemic costs and damages due to the alleged security breach).
After the inauguration, there was a meeting to upgrade the cooperation, including “Yves LECY, Director of INSERM, Dr. Hervé RAOUL, since 2005 Director of Jean Mérieux-Inserm Biosafety Level-4 Laboratory in Lyon, Mr. Dianwen Cao, Vice President of Bureau of International Cooperation, CAS, and stakeholders from CNAS, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention and WIV.” 3
Raoul (not hero Dr. Didier Raoult), is since 2008 Chairman of RINHA (European Research Infrastructure of Highly Pathogenic Agents), later (1 Jan 2021), deputy director to the National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis (ANRS), including “STIs, tuberculosis, Covid-19, viral haemorrhagic fevers and arboviruses”.4 Having published on ebola, lassa, arenavirus, H1N1, H5N1,5 and experimenting with HIV 6 (part of which was inserted into COVID), he was essential in know-how transfer. 7
Nature article: self-fulfilling prophecy?
• “The move is part of a plan to build between five and seven biosafety level-4 (BSL-4) labs across the Chinese mainland by 2025. One BSL-4 lab in Harbin is already awaiting accreditation; the next two are expected to be in Beijing and Kunming, the latter focused on using monkey models to study disease.
• SARS virus has escaped from high-level containment facilities in Beijing multiple times. Some scientists outside China worry about pathogens escaping, and the addition of a biological dimension to geopolitical tensions between China and other nations.These facilities are inherently dual use (note: military purposes).
• But Chinese microbiologists are celebrating their entrance to the elite cadre empowered to wrestle with the world’s greatest biological threats ... (and) act as a World Health Organization ‘reference laboratory’
• Future plans include studying the pathogen that causes SARS, which also doesn’t require a BSL-4 lab (note: unless weaponizing it) … In particular, the emergence of zoonotic viruses — those that jump to humans from animals, such as SARS (note: as in SARS-Cov-1, zoonotism is the perfect cover for gain of function).
• Many staff from the Wuhan lab have been training at a BSL-4 lab in Lyon.” 8
US masons step in
The Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV P4 lab) was a Chinese bio-warfare facility with ties to the highest Chinese CCP and military authorities, was later funded by the Fauci (USA) military industrial complex 9, the Canadian BSL4 lab10 and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, obsessed with SARS bioweapons. 11
20 Oct 2017. The WIV signed an agreement with the University of Texas Medical Branch UTMB’s P4 Galveston National Laboratory to collaborate on viral scientific research, with the Chinese lab entitled to order the Texas lab to “destroy” any “secret files” (which was illegal for the Texas lab since the funding was public).12 “The lab in Texas, with funding from the National Institutes of Health, was doing biosafety training with the lab in Wuhan.”13… since 2013 till present spent millions of dollars without any return along 10 years, just generously training in biosafety, no less than China, the alleged enemy number one of the USA.
Excellent! Thank you to you & all who contributed your time so generously to this.