There is so little to trust within the Vaccine/Pharma/NIH/FDA/CDC Industrial Complex, why should we believe that what they say is in the vax is actually in the vax? We already know the PCR test & interpretations thereof are horribly flawed. There seems to be evidence that just 5% of vax lots cause most of the reported AE's. This may simply be a quality control problem, however, there also seems to be evidence that there has been some level of coordination in where/when these 'defective' lots were rolled out. It doesn't take a great leap of imagination to speculate that should one have the goal of using vax's to deliver any level of harm, it could be controlled to a greater or lesser degree via managed lot distribution. It might also be feasible to deliver placebo lots to selected populations. This would suggest that the vax's are not what we are told they are and if that could be the case, then why couldn't the PCR (& other) tests be as easily manipulated?
if an employer mandates an experimental drug and then retaliates against someone for not taking it by firing them I think that is a crime and a violation of the nuremberg code. opinion?
Yes, coercion is by definition what the Code was meant to protect against. However, it is unclear [and unlikely] if the 2005 provision [or later edits] regarding special EUA measures would violate that or not.
Regardless, the spirit of the law has been blatantly circumvented, and it needs to be modified to prevent future emergency exploitation.
In the United States, precedent & the 9th/10th Amendments allows private companies and states to impose their own mandates.
The sinister/cynical actions by the President stem from his THREAT of a federal mandate, moreso than what he was able to impose. He knew there'd be a window of time before the Supreme Court overruled what was a blatant violation of executive authority, and employers showed zero courage.
Will find out next week if/when the mandate in the USAF will be enforced and what they will do with us. So far, I have submitted: a religious exemption; medical exemption; proof of antibodies (natural immunity); and have been approved for my civil-service retirement - just in case. Will wait to see what is going to happen. Methinks the mandates may in fact be voided by the SCOTUS. We shall see...
I think that experience with livestock mRNA vaccines would have been a clear indicator of what to expect from this technology, see, e.g., these posts by eugyppius:
It's absolutely terrifying that 1. They would force vaccinate American's, knowing there is a potential for SAE's up to and including death. With that being said, so many globalists discuss depopulation being climate friendly, so it isn't shocking. 2. Is there any data to suggest that 🇨🇳 population is being affected vaccines like we are here and other countries?
Lastly, do you think AGHuff was set up by EcoAlliance? The IC community is clearly using psyops to make him look like he's paranoid. He's employed by MSU, and they receive millions in federal funding for tuition and research, so I'm sure they will ax him, unless he's truly a tenured assistant professor, which is rare.
Thank you for your service. Both of my parents are Marines and raised me to respectfully question everything, my mom more-so than my father, since she saw things with her level of top secret clearance. She never spoke of those things but always said that the government can be very dishonest in their dealings home and abroad.
2. China's non-mRNA vaccines were terrible themselves, but we don't have to worry about ever seeing the data that they have. We don't have to rely on China, though, if what you're interested in is vaccine data, because there is a lot of evidence elsewhere.
3. Huff's case may have partially been timed to protect him from retribution, although that's just a supposition. I've talked with him online, & I don't see any reason to doubt his assertions. The good thing is that a lot of positive momentum has been building recently, which makes it less vital to score points from his lawsuit. The intel community still has plenty to lose, however, and his highlighting of their activities makes sense if it prevents them from being able to smother public awareness of his case.
Fauci is on record discussing "new technology" vaccines in relation to a universal flu vaccine which can only mean mRNA technology. Fauci also says in the same forum that acceptance of "new technology" vaccines would take 10 years at best, unless some kind of global disruption occurred and there was government support. Now, im not saying at all that Fauci manufactured the pandemic, thats a story for a different day, but Fauci certainly made good use of this "global disruption" and "government support" to push his "new technology" vaccines into the mainstream where everyone accepted them without question. In fact questions were vehemently discouraged.
There is so little to trust within the Vaccine/Pharma/NIH/FDA/CDC Industrial Complex, why should we believe that what they say is in the vax is actually in the vax? We already know the PCR test & interpretations thereof are horribly flawed. There seems to be evidence that just 5% of vax lots cause most of the reported AE's. This may simply be a quality control problem, however, there also seems to be evidence that there has been some level of coordination in where/when these 'defective' lots were rolled out. It doesn't take a great leap of imagination to speculate that should one have the goal of using vax's to deliver any level of harm, it could be controlled to a greater or lesser degree via managed lot distribution. It might also be feasible to deliver placebo lots to selected populations. This would suggest that the vax's are not what we are told they are and if that could be the case, then why couldn't the PCR (& other) tests be as easily manipulated?
I’m fairly certain only a few of the vaccine lots were actually vaccine. The rest were saline.
If you look at adverse events they all seem to happen from a very small number of lots.
I believe our military was given saline. As we’re all politicians, celebrities, athletes, etc.
Am curious what you think about the Spike Ferritin Nanoparticle (SpFN) COVID-19 vaccine developed by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research:
https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2021/12/us-army-creates-single-vaccine-effective-against-all-covid-sars-variants/360089/
if an employer mandates an experimental drug and then retaliates against someone for not taking it by firing them I think that is a crime and a violation of the nuremberg code. opinion?
Yes, coercion is by definition what the Code was meant to protect against. However, it is unclear [and unlikely] if the 2005 provision [or later edits] regarding special EUA measures would violate that or not.
Regardless, the spirit of the law has been blatantly circumvented, and it needs to be modified to prevent future emergency exploitation.
In the United States, precedent & the 9th/10th Amendments allows private companies and states to impose their own mandates.
The sinister/cynical actions by the President stem from his THREAT of a federal mandate, moreso than what he was able to impose. He knew there'd be a window of time before the Supreme Court overruled what was a blatant violation of executive authority, and employers showed zero courage.
Will find out next week if/when the mandate in the USAF will be enforced and what they will do with us. So far, I have submitted: a religious exemption; medical exemption; proof of antibodies (natural immunity); and have been approved for my civil-service retirement - just in case. Will wait to see what is going to happen. Methinks the mandates may in fact be voided by the SCOTUS. We shall see...
your wingman,
reeko
I think that experience with livestock mRNA vaccines would have been a clear indicator of what to expect from this technology, see, e.g., these posts by eugyppius:
1. https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/we-are-all-cattle-now
2. https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/bovine-coronavirus-and-us
It's absolutely terrifying that 1. They would force vaccinate American's, knowing there is a potential for SAE's up to and including death. With that being said, so many globalists discuss depopulation being climate friendly, so it isn't shocking. 2. Is there any data to suggest that 🇨🇳 population is being affected vaccines like we are here and other countries?
Lastly, do you think AGHuff was set up by EcoAlliance? The IC community is clearly using psyops to make him look like he's paranoid. He's employed by MSU, and they receive millions in federal funding for tuition and research, so I'm sure they will ax him, unless he's truly a tenured assistant professor, which is rare.
Thank you for your service. Both of my parents are Marines and raised me to respectfully question everything, my mom more-so than my father, since she saw things with her level of top secret clearance. She never spoke of those things but always said that the government can be very dishonest in their dealings home and abroad.
1. Yes.
2. China's non-mRNA vaccines were terrible themselves, but we don't have to worry about ever seeing the data that they have. We don't have to rely on China, though, if what you're interested in is vaccine data, because there is a lot of evidence elsewhere.
3. Huff's case may have partially been timed to protect him from retribution, although that's just a supposition. I've talked with him online, & I don't see any reason to doubt his assertions. The good thing is that a lot of positive momentum has been building recently, which makes it less vital to score points from his lawsuit. The intel community still has plenty to lose, however, and his highlighting of their activities makes sense if it prevents them from being able to smother public awareness of his case.
Fauci is on record discussing "new technology" vaccines in relation to a universal flu vaccine which can only mean mRNA technology. Fauci also says in the same forum that acceptance of "new technology" vaccines would take 10 years at best, unless some kind of global disruption occurred and there was government support. Now, im not saying at all that Fauci manufactured the pandemic, thats a story for a different day, but Fauci certainly made good use of this "global disruption" and "government support" to push his "new technology" vaccines into the mainstream where everyone accepted them without question. In fact questions were vehemently discouraged.