FAQ's - Did Fauci know mRNA vaccines would fail? & The impact of the military vaccine mandate
My responses regarding two vital current topics
Note: **The Prometheus Hub page/post** compiled research and resources [1,500+] I’ve used/found/analyzed/watched/etc. during [and prior to] my efforts with DRASTIC, so that those who are looking for more about COVID’s origins can find it in one place.
I don’t plan on ever charging a subscription fee for any of the content on my site; everything I keep here is the result of 18 months of research conducted because it needed to be done and very few were doing it. However, this has literally been my full-time job since March 2020, so any ‘subscription’ as a donation will help me continue this work uninterrupted by the real world. Or, if you’re still in the recovery phase of the financial pandemic, spreading the word could be just as helpful to the cause; after all, everyone has suffered from the lack of honest & unbiased information from our leaders that would’ve helped us be clear-eyed about what we were going to face. I have no greater responsibility with this site than to keep it accessible to anyone who deserves the truth - which, of course, is all of us.
Alternatively, if you despise the shackles of Substack’s limited subscription options, you can donate any amount you want via Paypal @SARSCoVRix
My original post [elsewhere]….
On 9/21, Chris discussed DRASTIC’s release of a proposed EcoHealth Alliance project submitted to DARPA in early 2018, for their PREEMPT program. The documents don’t show just an intent by EHA to insert Furin Cleavage Sites into novel coronaviruses, they explicitly detail the steps that would be taken to do so.
However, the rejection letter from DARPA lays out another reason to say no – the proposal included a plan for vaccinating bats that didn’t account for the known hyper-recombination ability of coronaviruses. “PREEMPTive Spike” was my article written directly to highlight this point, although that aspect never entered into the broader public awareness of that leak.
Ralph Baric even discussed the problem in the very same “GOF” paper that Fauci cited in his now-public emails, on 1/31/20, that helped spur the drive to suppress all such NIH ties to GOF research ever since.
________________Response in a private forum:
So, the dots are a little far apart here. And your article is over my head. Here is what I think I understand:
Fact 1 These mrna are classified as recombination/quasispecies evolution type. So (in plain English) the vaccines are based on a virus that is taken from one species and then in a lab modified with rna from another place.
Fact 2 The vaccines that are currently made using mrna technology can only target a small part of the virus (partial coverage epitope) . The covid vaccines target the spike. Maybe in the future the vaccines could target multiple areas on the virus.
Fact 3 It is well known in certain circles that a mrna vaccines for lab made virus, are ineffective. This is evident in a DARPA rejection of a vaccine of this type. https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F0c2e7e80-b90e-4d49-b214-2e2215cc2f9f_1141x537.png
If DARPA knew then the NIH and Fauci must have known.
Therefore, since the NIH knew COVID19 was an escape from a lab (which they hid) and it was a recombination/quasi-species type of virus and they knew that a mRNA vaccine was narrowly targeted at the spike. They knew it would fail due to vaccine evasion.
There are a number of things that occur to me from this article. They might not have known that the spike protein itself was toxic and could cause loads of side effects. The fact that they hid the origin for so long had a additional benefit for them, it hid that they knew the vaccine would fail.
A few clarifications:
1. All coronaviruses evolve via recombination at much higher rates than ‘typical’ viruses; most living things [including us] evolve via random mutations, but recombination can occur whenever two distinct virion particles infect the same cell. This tendency is exponentially enhanced by the quasipsecies that you mentioned, which is the correct term for what ‘infects’ someone.
What’s important is that these processes are natural, even if additional engineering takes place.
The mRNA vaccines ‘simply’ took the spike protein from the dominant strain, inserted that into a sequence of mRNA meant to tell your cells to produce the spike protein, and surrounded that sequence with a tiny ball of fat [lipid].
Basically, the ‘nanoparticle’ is the spike, and the lipid is how the spike is protected until it can get into the appropriate cells and trigger spike production. The DARPA proposal included a less-advanced method for achieving immune responses in bats, but the weakness is the same regardless.
2. “Partial Epitope Coverage” is absolutely the key phrase; it is the piecemeal approach that produces ‘leaky’ vaccines, which is even worse when the goal is a virus that naturally recombines and infects as a quasi-species swarm.
The same idea has been used as the basis for a universal-flu vaccine, but thus far has been unsuccessful because influenza viruses [and most other pathogens] operate in similar ways in terms of evolution – just in different proportions for each method.
3. It’s well known that all coronaviruses share this same tendency to recombine, so the ‘partial epitope coverage’ strategy is a short-term solution at best, regardless of whether or not the virus targeted by the vaccine came from a lab or not.
4. DARPA rejected a CoV vaccine in BATS that NIH [3 years later] has created and pushed the President to force universal vaccination of the troops.
Fauci is the director of the National Insititute for Allergy & Infectious Diseases – and has been for 36 years. The NIAID is the world’s foremost research institution for understanding the immunological interactions of infectious diseases, and had worked directly for years on CoV vaccine tech with Ralph Baric, Moderna & other labs.
So yes – Fauci knew. The NIH/Moderna amended their pan-flu contract in 2018 [3 months after DARPA rejected the EHA PREEMPT proposal] to add a program for a pan-coronavirus vaccine under the auspices of the NIH’s Vaccine Research Center [which ultimately produced the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine]
5. Therefore yes- Fauci hid his connections to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and neglected to mention to America that his mRNA vaccines were a short-term solution only. Thus, his support for a vaccine mandate RIGHT AT the moment when vaccine escape was emerging is DISGUSTING.
And as we can clearly see, it continues even as we speak.
_________Another questioner ——→The US military and their current mandate
Adding to the questions/concerns, was this a tool to take down our military? By mandating literally thousands if healthy under 40’s to be vaccinated how much damage have we done?
Was it a tool designed to specifically take down our military?”
I don’t believe so;
What I haven’t been able to square is why the military would’ve continued to be administered the vaccines after the clear emergence of dangerous cardiovascular side effects – to me, this is an unconscionable risk for a Pentagon so obsessed with ‘readiness.’
This issue is near and dear to my heart, because I spent my Marine Corps career up close and personal with operations planning concerns, and the current policy flies in the face of decades of priorities.
What I can say is that this issue has been clarified [by myself and others] to numerous members of Congress, and efforts have been underway for several months to stop the military mandate. President Biden’s administration has thus far refused to flinch at rescinding the one mandate he has the constitutional authority to enforce.
It is barbaric and stupid regardless of intent. I was told the exact number and percentage of pilots under observation for potential cardiac and/or neurological side effects from the vaccines [Marine pilots only, as of 1 October], and the impact was critical back then [I will not leak information that enemies could exploit].
I mostly just wanted to make sure to address these questions here on PS as well, because the questions are becoming more frequent.
I highly encourage all of my readers to ask questions about any details or random topics related to the pandemic; if I can’t answer it myself, I know who to ask or where to look.
There is so little to trust within the Vaccine/Pharma/NIH/FDA/CDC Industrial Complex, why should we believe that what they say is in the vax is actually in the vax? We already know the PCR test & interpretations thereof are horribly flawed. There seems to be evidence that just 5% of vax lots cause most of the reported AE's. This may simply be a quality control problem, however, there also seems to be evidence that there has been some level of coordination in where/when these 'defective' lots were rolled out. It doesn't take a great leap of imagination to speculate that should one have the goal of using vax's to deliver any level of harm, it could be controlled to a greater or lesser degree via managed lot distribution. It might also be feasible to deliver placebo lots to selected populations. This would suggest that the vax's are not what we are told they are and if that could be the case, then why couldn't the PCR (& other) tests be as easily manipulated?
Am curious what you think about the Spike Ferritin Nanoparticle (SpFN) COVID-19 vaccine developed by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research: