It would seem unlikely, given the volume of spray they are expelling. Also, the Omicron spike is very different, and the virions replicate largely in the upper respiratory tract, which honestly would be better served by the nasal-spray formulation. But, who knows? I don't know how much the manufacturing can scale
"Important" does not begin to describe the enormity of this latest piece. The question now remains, "how many members of Congress and State Legislatures are aware of this info and what will they do with it?"
My guess is absolutely nothing, but I still hold out hope that justice will prevail.
Apr 10, 2022·edited Apr 10, 2022Liked by Charles Rixey, MA, MBA (c)
I've been following covid-19 related issues since the beginning as carefully as I can. I've read a great many things from a wide variety of sources. This article is the most shocking thing I've read so far.
The idea that including HIV segments was for the purpose of making the virus vulnerable to peptide fusion inhibitor class of drugs is mind blowing. That is the missing puzzle piece that explains how an engineered virus could be so blithely released: they had an antidote.
That explains why the HIV gp120 insert paper goes straight to Fauci immediately and resulted in zerohedge getting an immediate tech company smackdown. It also explains the early efforts to suppress HCQ. For that, the Gallaher booklet is extremely revealing. He clearly got coaching for his 'update' version of Feb 7. For instance, he went from not masks to advising masks. That was marching orders. In his update he also mentions chloroquine might be effective. That recognition leads to the global suppression of HCQ. An example being a national stockpile in US buys it up to create a shortage. France makes it prescription only. A precursor factory for HCQ is burnt down in Taiwan. Then the deluge of fake news like the fish cleaner story.
Now what would be very interesting is a roadmap, some kind of data, that shows exactly who was getting and taking the correct fusion inhibitors. I would very much like to know. Whoever they are, they are responsible for every death from covid-19 and the vaccines combined.
EDIT: I want to add that remdesivir in this interpretation of events should be seen as a deliberate tool to murder people to boost the death rate. As was the strategy of infecting nursing home residents. They knew which drugs were likely to work and picked one that was likely to kill. It is the AZT of sars-cov-2.
You're preaching to the choir on Remdesivir; our maid of honor at our wedding died at 26 last fall, on a ventilator and with kidney failure.
The gp120 fragments happen to include a PRRA furin cleavage site, which combines with the inhibitor target to make the construction a truly ingenious insert that unequivocally couldn't have come from nature.
Thank you, and I am sharing your extremely important information. I am also becoming a paid subscriber. I wonder how long such work as you describe has been ongoing.
Almost exactly one year ago, I was asked to give a short talk to a community group on the vaccines. In preparing for it, I read up on the 2003 SARS outbreak and realized there are similarities, e.g., China hiding it until it escaped elsewhere, uncertainty about the origin of the outbreak, the WHO's cooperation with China, and still-erroneous case counts. I also ran across this piece, in which "Changchun Tu, a virologist who directs the OIE Reference Laboratory for Rabies in Changchun, China," expressed some remaining reservations about the natural spread of the original SARS:
"To clinch the case, a team led by Shi Zheng-Li and Cui Jie of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China sampled thousands of horseshoe bats in locations across the country3. “The most challenging work is to locate the caves, which usually are in remote areas,” says Cui. After finding a particular cave in Yunnan, southwestern China, in which the strains of coronavirus looked similar to human versions4,5, the researchers spent five years monitoring the bats that lived there, collecting fresh guano and taking anal swabs1.
"They sequenced the genomes of 15 viral strains from the bats and found that, taken together, the strains contain all the genetic pieces that make up the human version. Although no single bat had the exact strain of SARS coronavirus that is found in humans, the analysis showed that the strains mix often. The human strain could have emerged from such mixing, says Kwok-Yung Yuen, a virologist at the University of Hong Kong who co-discovered the SARS virus: “The authors should be congratulated for confirming what has been suspected.”
"But Changchun Tu, a virologist who directs the OIE Reference Laboratory for Rabies in Changchun, China, says the results are only “99%” persuasive. He would like to see scientists demonstrate in the lab that the human SARS strain can jump from bats to another animal, such as a civet. "If this could have been done, the evidence would be perfect,” he says.
"Another outstanding question is how a virus from bats in Yunnan could travel to animals and humans around 1,000 kilometres away in Guangdong, without causing any suspected cases in Yunnan itself. That “has puzzled me a long time”, says Tu."
Yunnan to Guangdong: 600-780 miles; 1,000-1,300 km
I just finished watching your interview with James Couey, and you made a comment that I would like to address as simply as possible. Towards the end of the interview you made the query, "I can't fathom how our leaders could do this to their own people." To put it simply and succinctly; greed, avarice, and unadulterated wickedness. This is purely evil.
After watching your interview, I have a whole new level of appreciation for the work you are doing.
There’s another piece of evidence coming into view, on the legal side. I’ve been reading through the many Congressional statutes and implementing HHS regulations adopted, mostly since 2000, on the bioterrorism front, from the 1983 law that first set up the Public Health Emergency framework under the 1944 Public Health Service Act, through the 2000 Public Health Improvement Act (which expanded HHS Secretary’s powers almost a year before the anthrax attacks) to the 2020 CARES Act and the current HR 34 - Cures Act 2.0.
There are a lot of them.
But a repeated phrase that keeps coming up is the definition of ‘covered countermeasure’ or ‘qualified pandemic or epidemic product’ to include both
“i. a product manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed or procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat, or cure a pandemic or epidemic; or to limit the harm such pandemic or epidemic might otherwise cause;
OR
ii. a product manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed, or procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat or cure a serious or life-threatening disease or condition caused by a product described in clause (i).”
See, for example, 42 USC 247d-6d(i)(7)(A) [PREP Act of 2005]
Every time I see it, I note in the margins “”poison and antidote.”
If I’m reading the threads on the go-120 sequences correctly, it’s related to this legal framework: the same team of people designed the poison and the antidote, distributed the poison and is preparing now to roll out the antidote, as a expansion of the control,profit, enslave, kill paradigm.
Bioterrorism is legal, so long as it’s governments committing acts of bioterrorism on their own citizens.
evidence that they’ve done the research to design the poisons and antidotes,
evidence that they discredited all the early treatments and doctors and scientists recommending early treatment,
evidence that they profiteer from pandemics, and
evidence that they’ve set up legal immunities for themselves for both types of products.
I’m watching to see how things develop as the chronic diseases caused by the vaxxes come into view more broadly, and how the government differentially classifies, promotes, authorizes reimbursement for and/or withholds treatments — demonizing some (such as hydroxychloroquin, Ivermectin, Vit. D, monoclonal antibodies), while promoting others (Remdesivir, ventilators, molnupiravir, vaxxes, others still to be named etc.)
I hold out little hope that true "justice" will be served based on our history of government accountability. I pray that I am wrong and will be pleased to be proven wrong this time because of the national and global implications of their crimes against humanity!
I think that used to be true in practice, and is still true in principle, but I also think the criminals have set up statutory waivers and exemptions to even exempt themselves from liability in cases where fraud is proven. Still digging to confirm, but at least one of the statutes or regulations passed in the last 20 years that I read recently changed the wording around “adulterated” products, such that, if I’m understanding correctly, even if it’s demonstrated that the products in the vials don’t match the ingredients the manufacturers claimed — as Craig Paardekooper, Andreas Oehler,
and others have reported via whistleblowers — that’s not a legally significant fact anymore, in certain contexts set up to enable the crime.
Again, I need to keep going with my reading and analysis of the statutes, but I saw that in one of them and anticipate finding it again to be able to pull the quotes and citations.
I agree, this will be redressed, most likely short-term through direct action, and medium to long-term through legislation and courts. And I also am planning to be part of the movement that pushes the legal reforms and court cases forward. For one thing, I don’t think the criminals intended to commit the crime this early, and I don’t think they expected global resistance to form as quickly and thoroughly as it has. So there’s more of a control group than expected, and more skepticism even among those who took the first one, two or three injections.
I just don’t think short-term criminal or civil prosecutions are going to get far until the enabling statutes and regulations are widely understood (as part of the overall coverup scheme, put into place before the series of crimes began), and repealed.
It's good; I'd suggest checking out the updated version of the Research Gate document, because the full argument has a number of different facets beyond fusion inhibitors.
The bottom line is that great harm was done because scientists censored science in order to hide damning research connections from the public
I know this an old post so I don't know if you'll see my comment above. But I hope you have the time to read and possibly even answer. Thanks for all you do.
I'm no scientist, just a dabbler, but I've often wondered--If a virus was intentionally leaked in a biowarfare situation, wouldn't the leakers need a way to not succumb to the virus? How could they ensure keeping themselves safe from harm? Are these fusion inhibitors the answer? And are there natural fusion inhibitors available to the common man, or do they need to be designed for the specific viruses?
Great Job.
Is that what the Covid stormtroopers are spraying in China? Fusion inhibitors?
It would seem unlikely, given the volume of spray they are expelling. Also, the Omicron spike is very different, and the virions replicate largely in the upper respiratory tract, which honestly would be better served by the nasal-spray formulation. But, who knows? I don't know how much the manufacturing can scale
Apparently there’s some evidence of fusion inhibitor efficacy against Omicron, which goes to the continuing relevance of your analysis here.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41422-022-00617-x
Excellent work.
"Important" does not begin to describe the enormity of this latest piece. The question now remains, "how many members of Congress and State Legislatures are aware of this info and what will they do with it?"
My guess is absolutely nothing, but I still hold out hope that justice will prevail.
Thanks again for your tireless efforts.
Some of them are now aware, thankfully, as our message is beginning to puncture the Swamp's cone of censorship.
I don't worry about what others might not do - all I can say is that justice will prevail as long as I have something to say about it.
I've been following covid-19 related issues since the beginning as carefully as I can. I've read a great many things from a wide variety of sources. This article is the most shocking thing I've read so far.
The idea that including HIV segments was for the purpose of making the virus vulnerable to peptide fusion inhibitor class of drugs is mind blowing. That is the missing puzzle piece that explains how an engineered virus could be so blithely released: they had an antidote.
That explains why the HIV gp120 insert paper goes straight to Fauci immediately and resulted in zerohedge getting an immediate tech company smackdown. It also explains the early efforts to suppress HCQ. For that, the Gallaher booklet is extremely revealing. He clearly got coaching for his 'update' version of Feb 7. For instance, he went from not masks to advising masks. That was marching orders. In his update he also mentions chloroquine might be effective. That recognition leads to the global suppression of HCQ. An example being a national stockpile in US buys it up to create a shortage. France makes it prescription only. A precursor factory for HCQ is burnt down in Taiwan. Then the deluge of fake news like the fish cleaner story.
Now what would be very interesting is a roadmap, some kind of data, that shows exactly who was getting and taking the correct fusion inhibitors. I would very much like to know. Whoever they are, they are responsible for every death from covid-19 and the vaccines combined.
EDIT: I want to add that remdesivir in this interpretation of events should be seen as a deliberate tool to murder people to boost the death rate. As was the strategy of infecting nursing home residents. They knew which drugs were likely to work and picked one that was likely to kill. It is the AZT of sars-cov-2.
Poison-antidote sequence shows up in the legal frameworks as well:
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/legalized-bioterrorism-poisons-and?s=w
Correct, for the most part.
You're preaching to the choir on Remdesivir; our maid of honor at our wedding died at 26 last fall, on a ventilator and with kidney failure.
The gp120 fragments happen to include a PRRA furin cleavage site, which combines with the inhibitor target to make the construction a truly ingenious insert that unequivocally couldn't have come from nature.
Thank you, and I am sharing your extremely important information. I am also becoming a paid subscriber. I wonder how long such work as you describe has been ongoing.
Almost exactly one year ago, I was asked to give a short talk to a community group on the vaccines. In preparing for it, I read up on the 2003 SARS outbreak and realized there are similarities, e.g., China hiding it until it escaped elsewhere, uncertainty about the origin of the outbreak, the WHO's cooperation with China, and still-erroneous case counts. I also ran across this piece, in which "Changchun Tu, a virologist who directs the OIE Reference Laboratory for Rabies in Changchun, China," expressed some remaining reservations about the natural spread of the original SARS:
"To clinch the case, a team led by Shi Zheng-Li and Cui Jie of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China sampled thousands of horseshoe bats in locations across the country3. “The most challenging work is to locate the caves, which usually are in remote areas,” says Cui. After finding a particular cave in Yunnan, southwestern China, in which the strains of coronavirus looked similar to human versions4,5, the researchers spent five years monitoring the bats that lived there, collecting fresh guano and taking anal swabs1.
"They sequenced the genomes of 15 viral strains from the bats and found that, taken together, the strains contain all the genetic pieces that make up the human version. Although no single bat had the exact strain of SARS coronavirus that is found in humans, the analysis showed that the strains mix often. The human strain could have emerged from such mixing, says Kwok-Yung Yuen, a virologist at the University of Hong Kong who co-discovered the SARS virus: “The authors should be congratulated for confirming what has been suspected.”
"But Changchun Tu, a virologist who directs the OIE Reference Laboratory for Rabies in Changchun, China, says the results are only “99%” persuasive. He would like to see scientists demonstrate in the lab that the human SARS strain can jump from bats to another animal, such as a civet. "If this could have been done, the evidence would be perfect,” he says.
"Another outstanding question is how a virus from bats in Yunnan could travel to animals and humans around 1,000 kilometres away in Guangdong, without causing any suspected cases in Yunnan itself. That “has puzzled me a long time”, says Tu."
Yunnan to Guangdong: 600-780 miles; 1,000-1,300 km
Wuhan to Guangdong: 500-600 miles; 800-1,000 km
This piece:
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-017-07766-9
The best article on the timeline for the original SARS that I found:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7106085/
I just finished watching your interview with James Couey, and you made a comment that I would like to address as simply as possible. Towards the end of the interview you made the query, "I can't fathom how our leaders could do this to their own people." To put it simply and succinctly; greed, avarice, and unadulterated wickedness. This is purely evil.
After watching your interview, I have a whole new level of appreciation for the work you are doing.
There’s another piece of evidence coming into view, on the legal side. I’ve been reading through the many Congressional statutes and implementing HHS regulations adopted, mostly since 2000, on the bioterrorism front, from the 1983 law that first set up the Public Health Emergency framework under the 1944 Public Health Service Act, through the 2000 Public Health Improvement Act (which expanded HHS Secretary’s powers almost a year before the anthrax attacks) to the 2020 CARES Act and the current HR 34 - Cures Act 2.0.
There are a lot of them.
But a repeated phrase that keeps coming up is the definition of ‘covered countermeasure’ or ‘qualified pandemic or epidemic product’ to include both
“i. a product manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed or procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat, or cure a pandemic or epidemic; or to limit the harm such pandemic or epidemic might otherwise cause;
OR
ii. a product manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed, or procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat or cure a serious or life-threatening disease or condition caused by a product described in clause (i).”
See, for example, 42 USC 247d-6d(i)(7)(A) [PREP Act of 2005]
Every time I see it, I note in the margins “”poison and antidote.”
If I’m reading the threads on the go-120 sequences correctly, it’s related to this legal framework: the same team of people designed the poison and the antidote, distributed the poison and is preparing now to roll out the antidote, as a expansion of the control,profit, enslave, kill paradigm.
Bioterrorism is legal, so long as it’s governments committing acts of bioterrorism on their own citizens.
How do you know they're preparing to roll out the antidote ?
I speculate that they are, because of
evidence that they’ve done the research to design the poisons and antidotes,
evidence that they discredited all the early treatments and doctors and scientists recommending early treatment,
evidence that they profiteer from pandemics, and
evidence that they’ve set up legal immunities for themselves for both types of products.
I’m watching to see how things develop as the chronic diseases caused by the vaxxes come into view more broadly, and how the government differentially classifies, promotes, authorizes reimbursement for and/or withholds treatments — demonizing some (such as hydroxychloroquin, Ivermectin, Vit. D, monoclonal antibodies), while promoting others (Remdesivir, ventilators, molnupiravir, vaxxes, others still to be named etc.)
I hold out little hope that true "justice" will be served based on our history of government accountability. I pray that I am wrong and will be pleased to be proven wrong this time because of the national and global implications of their crimes against humanity!
Fraud supersedes liability waivers, because it 'voids' the contract, as it were.
I've previously read through all of the relevant statutes, and I will do everything I can to assist in any legal fights that are coming.
This will be redressed
I think that used to be true in practice, and is still true in principle, but I also think the criminals have set up statutory waivers and exemptions to even exempt themselves from liability in cases where fraud is proven. Still digging to confirm, but at least one of the statutes or regulations passed in the last 20 years that I read recently changed the wording around “adulterated” products, such that, if I’m understanding correctly, even if it’s demonstrated that the products in the vials don’t match the ingredients the manufacturers claimed — as Craig Paardekooper, Andreas Oehler,
https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/p/lasting-legacy-of-trojan-horses?s=r
and others have reported via whistleblowers — that’s not a legally significant fact anymore, in certain contexts set up to enable the crime.
Again, I need to keep going with my reading and analysis of the statutes, but I saw that in one of them and anticipate finding it again to be able to pull the quotes and citations.
I agree, this will be redressed, most likely short-term through direct action, and medium to long-term through legislation and courts. And I also am planning to be part of the movement that pushes the legal reforms and court cases forward. For one thing, I don’t think the criminals intended to commit the crime this early, and I don’t think they expected global resistance to form as quickly and thoroughly as it has. So there’s more of a control group than expected, and more skepticism even among those who took the first one, two or three injections.
I just don’t think short-term criminal or civil prosecutions are going to get far until the enabling statutes and regulations are widely understood (as part of the overall coverup scheme, put into place before the series of crimes began), and repealed.
Pardon the delay, but I finally got around to writing a simplified summary of your article. Let me know if I need to make corrections ;-)
https://flyingblind.substack.com/p/do-the-hiv-inserts-in-sars-cov-2?s=w
It's good; I'd suggest checking out the updated version of the Research Gate document, because the full argument has a number of different facets beyond fusion inhibitors.
The bottom line is that great harm was done because scientists censored science in order to hide damning research connections from the public
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359855384_The_Myth_of_the_Blind_Watchmaker
I know this an old post so I don't know if you'll see my comment above. But I hope you have the time to read and possibly even answer. Thanks for all you do.
I'm no scientist, just a dabbler, but I've often wondered--If a virus was intentionally leaked in a biowarfare situation, wouldn't the leakers need a way to not succumb to the virus? How could they ensure keeping themselves safe from harm? Are these fusion inhibitors the answer? And are there natural fusion inhibitors available to the common man, or do they need to be designed for the specific viruses?