5 Comments
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I was glad to see your recent interview with Dr. JJ Couey on his Gigaohm Biological channel. That is how I found your Substack space. I was following Couey on his YT virology bike rides from the very beginning. I first heard Couey on another podcast site in early 2020 devoted to earth anomalies and fringe news where he explained in detail and warned about ADE. The sheer fact that so many with all manner of types of expertise could see something was fishy early on, among all the evidence accumulated to date, is the best evidence of all. Scholars, journalists, and everyday critical thinkers who have run into censorship should consider hosting a broad based conference on censorship, and invite legislators.

Expand full comment

When a society employs censorship, it is like a person voluntarily putting a blindfold on their eyes.

Expand full comment

Yep. All of it. I have been a physician x 20 years and for 18 of those I never offered a patient the “consensus of care”. I offered gold standard or personal care, disagreed with my partners, attended M&M meetings to learn what I did wrong. Discussed new medications and treatments openly. Until 2020. It’s suffocating.

Without discretion we will harm people. Discretion is earned through open discussion.

Thank you for continuing that discussion. It makes me feel sane, for a minute, til I go to work.

Expand full comment

I absolutely agree with everything you've said about censorship - except for the proxy war in Ukraine part. It's true the Biden family has very corrupt ties with Zelenskyy and Kolomoyskyi in Ukraine - see https://streamfortyseven.substack.com/p/its-complicated-zelenskyy-turns-out. Zelenskyy, before the war, had a 30% popularity rating, and if Putin hadn't invaded - or if Zelenskyy had taken the ride out of the country and settled down in the $35 million mansion in Miami Beach bought for him by Kolomoyskyi - he'd be out, especially when the Biden scandals came to light. But he chose the risky route - to stand his ground in Ky'iv and to actually lead his nation, and for that, he's a hero - and he yet may be a very dead hero, if the Russians catch him.

As for the Russian invasion, there's now good evidence that the invasion - beginning with the seizure of Crimea some years ago, is part of a long standing Russian plan, which goes far beyond Ukraine - remember, this was written in 1997:

"Next comes the Ukrainian question. The sovereignty of Ukraine is such a negative phenomenon for Russian geopolitics that, in principle, it can easily provoke an armed conflict. Without the Black Sea coast from Izmail to Kerch, Russia gets such an extended coastal strip, really controlled by someone unknown, that its very existence as a normal and independent state is called into question. The Black Sea does not replace access to the "warm seas" and its geopolitical significance drops sharply due to the stable Atlanticist control over the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles, but at least it makes it possible to secure the central regions from the potential expansion of Turkish influence, being extremely convenient, reliable and an inexpensive border. Ukraine, as an independent state with some kind of territorial ambitions, poses a huge danger to the whole of Eurasia, and without a solution to the Ukrainian problem, it is pointless to talk about continental geopolitics at all. This does not mean that the cultural, linguistic or economic autonomy of Ukraine should be limited, and that it should become a purely administrative sector of the Russian centralized state (as, to some extent, was the case in the tsarist empire or under the USSR). But strategically, Ukraine should be strictly a projection of Moscow in the south and west (although more details about possible models of restructuring will be discussed in the chapter on the West). The absolute imperative of Russian geopolitics on the Black Sea coast is the total and unlimited control of Moscow along its entire length from Ukrainian to Abkhazian territories. It is possible to divide this entire zone on an ethno-cultural basis as much as you like, granting ethnic and confessional autonomy to the Crimean Little Russians, Tatars, Cossacks, Abkhazians, Georgians, etc., but all this only with absolute control of Moscow over the military and political situation. These sectors must be radically divorced from the thalassocratic influence coming from the west and from Turkey (or even Greece). The northern coast of the Black Sea should be exclusively Eurasian and centrally subordinate to Moscow..." https://n01r.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Foundations-of-Geopolitics-Geopolitical-Future-of-Russia-Alexander-Dugin-English-auto-translation-with-appended-original.pdf

And that last bit, written 25 years ago, is being carried out today. Crimea was the first chunk to be bitten off, now it’s Donetsk, Zaporhizia, and Kherson Oblasts, after that Odessa. Moldova appears to have been placed within the Moscow-dominated Eurasian sphere of influence. If this analysis is correct, then Romania is next, followed by Bulgaria, then the Baltic States, Poland, and the rest of the former Warsaw Pact countries - but Ukraine is the keystone. It should now be obvious - from this book written 25 years ago (whose full English translation I just found - French and German are easy, but Russian is hard work...) - that the outrage over the US-funded biological warfare labs and everything else was just a convenient pretext for something that was planned out decades ago.

Here’s some background on Aleksandr Dugin:

”Aleksandr Gelyevich Dugin, the man behind “Duginism,” is a Russian political strategist with ties to some of the most powerful people in Russia; various oligarchs, billionaires, Kremlinites, military men, and even Putin himself. This includes people such as Sergey Naryshkin (Director of the Foreign Intelligence Service), Igor Rodionov (Defence Minister), and Gennadiy Seleznyov (Chairman of the State Duma). Dugin’s father was a colonel-general of Russia’s Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU), which is essentially the Russian militaries’ own KGB; a foreign-intelligence agency. GRU was originally established in the USSR by Leon Trotsky’s deputy. Because Dugin’s father was an extremely high ranking glowie, Dugin was born into spookdom; the number of influential KGB agents that Dugin has collaborated with is too long to list: http://archive.vn/iOvCT." https://streamfortyseven.substack.com/p/putins-and-dugins-vision-of-a-greater

More, here: https://streamfortyseven.substack.com/p/the-greater-eurasian-plan-for-the

It's nearly impossible to find this in the shallow analysis offered by either side in the western press, but from this it can be seen that Putin is following a well laid out plan. He's acted as an autocrat, and since he's not a military guy, he's made some huge strategic blunders which have resulted in the present situation - which is likely to doom his plan - and his advisers knew that this might happen but were too afraid to say anything to him: https://streamfortyseven.substack.com/p/fsb-whistleblower-report-war-in-ukraine - and the Russian original of this article resulted in 150 people in the Fifth Directorate of the FSB being canned, being put under house arrest, and some of them winding up in cells in the infamous Lefortovo Prison in the Lubyanka... and all of that is the immediate result of fettered speech, censorship, and fear - Putin may have shot himself - and his country - in the foot, if not worse.

Expand full comment