The virus was created to drive demand for the proffered "vaccines". These so-called vaccines had the odd effects, unlike any other vaccines, of not preventing infection, and not stopping spread of the infection, and they have side effects, most of which have to do with reducing life expectancy, or killing outright (stillbirth, MI, stroke, PE) or in the short term. Another effect is sterilization - women have been made barren by this "vaccine". Now, we have a problem that isn't much talked about - world population growth. Right now the population is 7.9 billion. With growth of just 1% per year - 79 million people - the world population doubles in 70/1 years - 70 years. That's the rule of 70 - see this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBtW51D_q2Q. So that's about 16 billion people by 2092. Current predictions are 11 billion people by 2050, with current growth.
We have an economic system entirely dependent on fossil fuels and non-renewable resources, like the rare earth metal lithium, and there's a finite supply of these available. With every new person, an additional amount of energy from these sources is required to sustain life. Mechanized agriculture is pretty much a means for converting fossil fuel energy into food, and it's pretty efficient, but this entails, with exponential population growth, exponential growth in the use - and depletion - of a non-renewable resource of which there is a finite amount. And this means that there is a hard limit to growth. We could get to the point where it takes a barrel of oil's energy to recover a barrel of oil, and beyond that point, there's no use to the exercise. And globalist corporatism - which is what the WEF represents and advocates for - is a *huge* user of fossil fuels - oil to run cargo ships, military equipment, avgas for aircraft, and so on, not to mention mechanized agriculture. So there's this hard limit, and the rush towards it is driven by population - even without growth, with the kind of economic growth the WEF looks for to remain profitable, fossil fuels are predicted to be depleted by 2050. That's 28 years out, and that means the end of mechanized agriculture - and globalism. So they're looking at that probability right in front of them.
Various people have done calculations, and most of them come up with the figure of about 2 billion - the population in 1950 - as being a sustainable population. 7.9 billion - 2.0 billion = 5.9 billion people that are "off the island"... Now, if you offer people an injection that will result in their death - or radically foreshortened life expectancy, and the sterilization of their wives and children, chances are they won't take it. But if the injection is the answer to a fearsome pandemic where people go to hospitals and die horribly, they will gladly take it - and urge it on others, if they think they will be protected. So, in a short time, the globalists' problem is solved. And corporations never let mass murder get in the way of profits, growth, or, frankly, continued enjoyment of a certain lifestyle...
I have a question. What do you think about Omicron Ba.1 specifically, being a product of a laboraty rather than an accident of nature? What do you think about its lack of recent ancestors, lack of synonymous mutations etc?
Thanks for sharing your folder heirarchy & categorization structure. It's very helpful having this example of how you were able to make sense out of the turgid complex mess of the #plandemic, #covid-19 & the entire cast of characters involved.
The virus was created to drive demand for the proffered "vaccines". These so-called vaccines had the odd effects, unlike any other vaccines, of not preventing infection, and not stopping spread of the infection, and they have side effects, most of which have to do with reducing life expectancy, or killing outright (stillbirth, MI, stroke, PE) or in the short term. Another effect is sterilization - women have been made barren by this "vaccine". Now, we have a problem that isn't much talked about - world population growth. Right now the population is 7.9 billion. With growth of just 1% per year - 79 million people - the world population doubles in 70/1 years - 70 years. That's the rule of 70 - see this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBtW51D_q2Q. So that's about 16 billion people by 2092. Current predictions are 11 billion people by 2050, with current growth.
We have an economic system entirely dependent on fossil fuels and non-renewable resources, like the rare earth metal lithium, and there's a finite supply of these available. With every new person, an additional amount of energy from these sources is required to sustain life. Mechanized agriculture is pretty much a means for converting fossil fuel energy into food, and it's pretty efficient, but this entails, with exponential population growth, exponential growth in the use - and depletion - of a non-renewable resource of which there is a finite amount. And this means that there is a hard limit to growth. We could get to the point where it takes a barrel of oil's energy to recover a barrel of oil, and beyond that point, there's no use to the exercise. And globalist corporatism - which is what the WEF represents and advocates for - is a *huge* user of fossil fuels - oil to run cargo ships, military equipment, avgas for aircraft, and so on, not to mention mechanized agriculture. So there's this hard limit, and the rush towards it is driven by population - even without growth, with the kind of economic growth the WEF looks for to remain profitable, fossil fuels are predicted to be depleted by 2050. That's 28 years out, and that means the end of mechanized agriculture - and globalism. So they're looking at that probability right in front of them.
Various people have done calculations, and most of them come up with the figure of about 2 billion - the population in 1950 - as being a sustainable population. 7.9 billion - 2.0 billion = 5.9 billion people that are "off the island"... Now, if you offer people an injection that will result in their death - or radically foreshortened life expectancy, and the sterilization of their wives and children, chances are they won't take it. But if the injection is the answer to a fearsome pandemic where people go to hospitals and die horribly, they will gladly take it - and urge it on others, if they think they will be protected. So, in a short time, the globalists' problem is solved. And corporations never let mass murder get in the way of profits, growth, or, frankly, continued enjoyment of a certain lifestyle...
Charles, great article as always.
I have a question. What do you think about Omicron Ba.1 specifically, being a product of a laboraty rather than an accident of nature? What do you think about its lack of recent ancestors, lack of synonymous mutations etc?
Please start referring to the PANDEMIC OF THE VACCINATED
Thanks for sharing your folder heirarchy & categorization structure. It's very helpful having this example of how you were able to make sense out of the turgid complex mess of the #plandemic, #covid-19 & the entire cast of characters involved.