19 Comments
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

In my view, air-conditioning makes it much much worse (low humidity, low temperature and central air handling units covering large enclosed building areas; repeatedly mixing and recirculating the air from many diverse return air sources into one air handling unit). Buses, trains, office buildings, retail shopping centers etc. This also then contributes further to viral mutant species swarm and viral recombination from many pre diabetic infected hosts. In my view the virus loves cold temp and low humidity and can spread outdoors significantly at 24 hour temps below 15 degrees Celsius on cold cloudy days where the UV is low. Building managers also unlawfully keep AC fresh air intake to an absolute minimum, often less than 5%, because of latent heat power costs resulting from humid fresh air intake (humid air costs the most kW/h to cool, because the AC system must first remove the moisture content which consists of latent heat of evaporation). Add to this the 30% interferon hit from alcohol consumption and the 50% interleukin hit from chronic obesity and the clonal expansion hit from age and you have a perfect combination. Remember, first determine the weakness of your enemy, then you can exploit it to your geopolitical advantage. Our weakness is Obesity, Age, Chronic Disease, Corrupt Politicians and Corporate Greed. When all this is combined with the typical western comforts such as air-conditioned enclosed buildings - bingo - you have your perfect biological attack vector. Welcome to Next-Gen Geopolitical Warfare. What is the solution? Lose the fat, lazy and corrupt western lifestyle - and otherwise bend-over and cop the corona medicine. Every other attempt will only add further unwanted selective pressure and make the problem worse. Sometimes, in life, the other side wins - and you have to simply take what comes.

Expand full comment

I would love to share this with friends and family, but they would only view me as some anti-mask, anti lock down, conspiracy nut. I doubt they could read this and comprehend that just about every action we have taken has been a further acceleration of the pandemic.

Could you elaborate on the concept as kids as a buffer? I think I understand why but I’m not 100.

Another thing to note is the virus’ preferred climate, cold and low humidity. That sounds more like the climate of a lab than a bat cave in SE Asia doesn’t it?

I will try anyways. I have enjoyed reading your material since i first stumbled upon you last week.

Expand full comment

So are you asserting that the public health measures themselves are putting selection pressure on the covid virus to evolve into strains that spread better by aerosol and are able to survive being wafted around over longerdistances and survive for longer periods of time? Its makes sense if one understands how natural selection works. Also the leaky vaccines are selecting for strains that would escape the immune response to the original variant. We could be unintentionally creating superbugs

Expand full comment

This topic has come up at a small 8,000 sq. ft. sience & discovery center I'm on the board for, in regards to whether we should enforce a strict "Masks Only" or instead a "Masks Recommended" policy. I'd very much appreciate it if I could get professional insights on this given what you've concluded in your research!

For our small center we have a new HVAC system with a regularly maintained HEPA filter, but I've observed when we operated a fogger machine during Halloween how quickly the 8,000 sq. ft. space would fill with an aerosol haze. Given that each person at our center (usually around 20 people during peak hour) will expel over 400 liters of aerosols per hour, with or without masks, is there science in our case to suggest that masks would act enough as a prophylactic to guarantee prevention of transmission?

I feel like given the small space, pervasiveness of aerosols (even with masks), and the inability to prevent *enough* inhalation to prevent an infection, that masks aren't realistically going to help.

Could I get any thoughts or insights on this? Feelings aside, scientifically, will masks help *enough* in our case to ever prevent an infection?

Thanks!

Expand full comment

Good stuff, love the Einstein references. FYI- search ‘lest’ in your article, I think it should be ‘least’.

Expand full comment

Michael Osterholm, an American epidemiologist, Regents Professor at the University of Minnesota School of Public Health, and director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, stated very early on in the pandemic on the minnesota public tv program Almanac that he knew within the first two weeks of January 2020, (by Jan 11, 2020 comes to mind) that sars-cov-2 was spreading via aerosol transmission with all manner of implications.

Then, to me, it appeared he put his tail between his legs and headed for the hills because he told this truth contradicting "the narrative".

Osterholm knew very early - officialdumb must also have known.. I noted that in those early days fauci was saying masks were not needed for the public. fauci well knew the plan was for no availability of N95 masks - western governments had been destroying expired N95 and not replenishing their strategic stockpiles of N95 - the tiny US stocks were expired. fauci had just not yet been clued into the bogus masking recommendation plan.

I took such note of Osterholm's revelation that I called in to the local Secret Service office and left the message that they needed to listen to what Osterholm was saying, as it surely was necessary to understand for their proper protection of trump. I informed them how obvious it was, that without procedure changes, trump would get covid - which he later did. trump's Oct 2020 covid case showed that active, Real, asap covid treatment for those in the high risk category worked, and confirmed Dr Zelenko's letter dated March 23, 2020 addressed "To all medical professionals around the world:" which outlined Dr Zelenko's covid treatment protocol and its demonstrated, "pandemic" stopping, early outpatient treatment effectiveness for high risk covid patients.

Dr. Zelenko's letter was cc to "cc: President Donald J. Trump; Mr. Mark Meadows, Chief of Staff" and trump publicly acknowledged Dr Zelenko and Dr Zelenko's protocol at the time and trump did nothing to help Americans get access to early outpatient covid treatment

ps. fully vaxed and boosted boosted "narrative" purveyor Osterholm slipped up and got covid and was very sick for 4 months. He is now trying to protect himself with more shots and pushing shots for all - even the 6 month old baby.

Expand full comment