I watched the livestream and even though most of the science is over my head the basic idea of the problematic segments is pretty clear. The patient explanations are greatly appreciated and in thanks for the incredible effort you make here's a tip to make your searching easier.. please tell JJ as well Google is not your friend they bury content there are unfiltered options that work try Presearch <3 https://www.presearch.io/
Heroes for humanity. You two are what all of us should strive to be in your quest for truth and to help your fellow man. Thank you for all of your sacrifices for the rest of us. The truth is becoming brighter and brighter much in part for what you are doing. Lives will be saved and spared. Nothing in this world is more important than preserving the lives of those we love.
I have followed JC for over two years and probably watched 95% of his videos, but this is absolutely one of the best. Your work is incredible and truth must not be suppressed by the likes of that pencil-neck, Schiff.
Watched the replay all the way to the end. I was absolutely overwhelmed. Not just by what you have uncovered through your relentless research, but primarily by the depth of your sacrifice and commitment to get to the bottom of the secrets kept from us regarding the source of pandemic and the information that has been deliberately and nefariously witheld that could have prevented countless deaths.
Charles, you are the shining example leading the way for the rest of us to do our part. If the only part I can play right now is to contribute to your PayPal fund and encourage others to help defray the costs of your commitment and sacrifice, then that is where I will start. I can’t hope to live up to your example (or that of JJ and the rest of your compatriots who are risking so much to speak out) but I’m always seeking ways I can do my part. Thank you for all you have contributed. Wishing you and your family peace and happiness wherever the road leads you. Best wishes for a smooth relocation.
To you and to everybody who's been commenting, I'm truly grateful for your support.
This is something of an unusual blog in its structure, pacing, etc., and your patience is not lost on me.
The growing awareness of officials/Capitol Hill to the watchmaker information/evidence is highly encouraging; our challenge now is to translate this message and share it as broadly as possible.
Long COVID is the actual legacy of Fauci, and we can prove it.
Scholar, Hero, Teacher, warrior, of our time, Mr Rixey! You Sir, have helped more people than you know! A special shout out to Mrs Rixey, for her support!!!!
Okay, I am late to this discussion. For some reason I'm not getting notifications when you have a new post up. I haven't finished your Twitch livestream (replay) on the 4th with JC, but I am prompted to respond at the spot where you raise the questions about why is the HIV FCS sections taken out in those papers you have been reading. My understanding is by taking that section of the HIV proteins out, they get an attenuated vaccine. fauXi et al want those sections left in because they are extremely cytotoxic and the gp 120 goes straight to the brain with the jab within something like an hour. Those 4 HIV proteins work together: it's all malign synergy. The FCS is important for a bunch of reasons, and one of the modifications for the jabs is to enrich that site with extra G-Cs. When the cleavage happens all this bad stuff can happen better. Awesome catch on Dormitzer statement in 2016. I was my county prosecutor, have done criminal defense and more, so that's mens rea, that's willful and knowing misconduct, it's beyond negligence.
That paper with Senoff, McCullough et al talks about what that enrichment does to alter all these different cascades - another genius deliberate stroke - and the functioning of the quadraplexes. Enriching also sneaks the mRNA/spikes past the immune system/IFN-1 and then it effs the IFN-1 cascades all up and takes out the P53s that chew up cancer stuff. Until SARS2 HIV was the most glycosylated virus and that is what let HIV sneak past the early warning alarms. I ran into a paper last week - where they did 3D molecular mimicry for two areas of the spike and identified all these proteins that are crucial in important cascades, and they *humanized* them. There's also one that is from Timothy hay! Here it is - please, if you would take a look at Table 1 and 2. Talk about elegant engineering... Horrific, but elegant. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.10.455737v3.full.pdf
Dang, I'd love to talk with you about all this stuff. I catch myself talking to the video as you guys go along because the ground you are covering is fascinating. I am amazed how you have taught yourself to read all those sequence frames fluently. Dang.
And you've seen how they want to do this omicron jab mixed with the Wuhan - because the omicrons have the prion/amyloid promoting sequences silenced? Putting Wuhan in it ("a bivalent vaccine" - catchy phrase, grrr.) restores that horrible prion/amyloid promoting area. Anyway, I'll go finish watching and taking notes. So glad! you post here, on twitter and do what you do. Thank you! You are making much difference in the battlescape.
The paper by Gallagher and Garry, 2003 that you mentioned might be memory holed. Going to the article on the journal's website results in an error. Could be a coincidence?
W.R. Gallaher, R.F. Garry, Model of the pre-insertion region of the spike (S2) fusion glycoprotein of the human SARS coronavirus: implications for antiviral therapeutics, Virology (2003) http://www. virology.net/sars/s2model.html.
Question: does the presence of homology in SARS-CoV to HIV-1 elements indicate natural origin? Did the GoF on SARS-CoV-2 not include introducing HIV elements but perhaps just enhancing them?
Responding to your question about the homology of SARS to short HIV elements: I have not studied the papers, but understand from a Charles Rixey podcast, link follows, that one way scientists were trying to identify potentially useful antigenic elements of HIV for universal neutralizing antibody production, was to insert HIV elements into other virus genomes creating a pseudovirus. This seems like proper research to me and one benefit would be working with a much less dangerous virus. A question is whether this research was then used to make a more dangerous SARS virus.
Rixey thinks it was. For example, the literature suggests that the furin cleavage site is from HIV gp120 and that the furin site is one of a number of HIV homologous elements identified in SARS-CoV-2. Criticism of the paper "Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag" included that the sequence homologies were too short to be significant. That is only accurate if those elements actually are insignificant and I do not know that the critics made any effort at empirical evidence for their dismissive claim. Looking at the HIV elements in the 3D structure of the SARS-CoV-2 folding spike trimeric protein, it appears that the HIV elements are in the critical recognition domain, the cleavage domain, and the fusion domain. This topic needs research by scientists looking for data and interpreting it away from politics.
I think the relevant information on HIV-SARS pseudovirus particles was at or beyond the halfway mark in the video linked above. I'm pretty sure it was in part 1. Part 2 is also on Rumble.
Edit: I just realized that Charles Rixey is the author of this article. Hehe. Good work, Mr. Rixey.
Thank you very much for your response. I did read the 'Uncanny similarity' paper and thought, based on it, that SARS-CoV-2 was the first SARS with HIV homologies.
If Gallaher 2003 is correct about SARS-CoV(1) homologies with HIV, then we might want to look into evidence for GoF work on SARS before 2003.
I do know Baric was doing this stuff before then, so that is not impossible, right?
The homology Gallaher focused on in 2003 mostly referred to the region of the fusion peptide; Gallaher had discovered the nature and function of the HIV-1 fusion peptide in 1987, and helped to build a 3-tiered classification system to differentiate between the various viruses and investigate the usefulness of the homology with fusion peptide inhibitors, which he and Shibo Jiang [and later Robert Garry] were important in the development of. It's certainly clear that Gallaher was not enamored with vaccines, especially for coronaviruses, which might've been a strike against him already when he published his book full of therapeutic recommendations.
As far as a comparison with SARS, it was capable of infecting immune cells, too, but not by way of high homology with key residues from the variable loops on the gp120 region of HIV-1. One of the many possible rabbit holes still to be explored is whether the original SARS-CoV was manipulated prior to the 2002-2003 outbreak, but the evidence is much weaker than for SARS-CoV-2.
For example, the fact that SARS-CoV-2 interacts with ACE2 & Furin & TMPRSS2 & DC-SIGN/CD209 & thus CD4+ & also has more than ORF that can suppress the interferon responses means that it is capable of infecting a range of different cell tissues and quickly replicate before your immune response kicks in. This is absolutely the worst possible combination, because the odds of a cytokine storm exponentially increases, and if you survive your immune system is degraded while the hypoxia and furin have triggered cancer cells and amyloid fibril buildup.
InMyOpn, i can't read any of the text on that rumble linked video. Is there high quality video of the conversation (part 1 and 2)? I cannot find one on the usual sites.
Yes, the selection and construction of the HIV inserts in the SARS-CoV-2 genome follows the general methods used for today's mosaic, multi-clade and conserved epitope strategies with HIV vaccines [these strategies are applied to other virus vaccines as well, but the fact that
-three of the four inserts sit at the most accessible locations of the N-Loops on the SARS-CoV-2 virus and come together to allow access to T-cells,
-while providing glycosolation for protection
-AND greatly increasing the hydrophobicity of their respective areas,
-AND don't get in the way of ACE2 processes
-AND come from different clades/continents, akin to multi-clade HIV methods,
-AND have seen an abnormally rate of mutation in the direct vicinity of the inserts
-AND only appear in three other virus strains ever identified - all three of which may be previous 'steps' in the process of adding in inserts by Chinese scientists,
makes the odds of such inserts being natural worse than those of my Cowboys to win the Super Bowl this year.
A lot of y'all newbies need to check out things we've been uncovering long before 2020. Didn't go down the 9/11 rabbit hole yet? Hmm. Lots of misdirection there too, but only one truth.
The rumble video is BADELY DEGRADED. Resolution 284x160! We need at least 720p video to have a chance at pausing and reading what you pull up on screen!
Did you upload a 160-line resolution video Charles, or did Rumble degrade it?
If you have it in reasonable quality please upload to Kevin McCairn's server, thank you.
Amazing discussion with Dr Couey. I thought I couldn't be saddened by this stuff anymore, but you outlined the malice so clearly. You've done great work for all people.
I watched the livestream and even though most of the science is over my head the basic idea of the problematic segments is pretty clear. The patient explanations are greatly appreciated and in thanks for the incredible effort you make here's a tip to make your searching easier.. please tell JJ as well Google is not your friend they bury content there are unfiltered options that work try Presearch <3 https://www.presearch.io/
Thanks, PamelaDrew.
Subscribed.
Folks, these "subs" that come up with such helpful tips and info are pretty much guaranteed to be good columns to subscribe too.
Random riffs and lots of pics that are always fun! :~)
My lord, this conversation is fascinating, utterly bombshell, and deeply moving...all at once.
Heroes for humanity. You two are what all of us should strive to be in your quest for truth and to help your fellow man. Thank you for all of your sacrifices for the rest of us. The truth is becoming brighter and brighter much in part for what you are doing. Lives will be saved and spared. Nothing in this world is more important than preserving the lives of those we love.
I have followed JC for over two years and probably watched 95% of his videos, but this is absolutely one of the best. Your work is incredible and truth must not be suppressed by the likes of that pencil-neck, Schiff.
Watched the replay all the way to the end. I was absolutely overwhelmed. Not just by what you have uncovered through your relentless research, but primarily by the depth of your sacrifice and commitment to get to the bottom of the secrets kept from us regarding the source of pandemic and the information that has been deliberately and nefariously witheld that could have prevented countless deaths.
Charles, you are the shining example leading the way for the rest of us to do our part. If the only part I can play right now is to contribute to your PayPal fund and encourage others to help defray the costs of your commitment and sacrifice, then that is where I will start. I can’t hope to live up to your example (or that of JJ and the rest of your compatriots who are risking so much to speak out) but I’m always seeking ways I can do my part. Thank you for all you have contributed. Wishing you and your family peace and happiness wherever the road leads you. Best wishes for a smooth relocation.
Linda,
To you and to everybody who's been commenting, I'm truly grateful for your support.
This is something of an unusual blog in its structure, pacing, etc., and your patience is not lost on me.
The growing awareness of officials/Capitol Hill to the watchmaker information/evidence is highly encouraging; our challenge now is to translate this message and share it as broadly as possible.
Long COVID is the actual legacy of Fauci, and we can prove it.
I have no doubt that this worth fighting for
Charles, you're a hero.
Fantastic dude. That was one of the best streams I've seen yet.
Your work and sacrifice is really appreciated.
Scholar, Hero, Teacher, warrior, of our time, Mr Rixey! You Sir, have helped more people than you know! A special shout out to Mrs Rixey, for her support!!!!
THANK YOU!
Hello friend!
I so agree with you on the oddities - "Proximal Origins must be retracted and the diffamation of scientists as "conspiracy theorists" must end!"
Btw. I got cancelled from Twitter for having been censored/thrown out of my account before. I never got a reason for locking me out the first times!
Cheers!!!
Thank you!
Okay, I am late to this discussion. For some reason I'm not getting notifications when you have a new post up. I haven't finished your Twitch livestream (replay) on the 4th with JC, but I am prompted to respond at the spot where you raise the questions about why is the HIV FCS sections taken out in those papers you have been reading. My understanding is by taking that section of the HIV proteins out, they get an attenuated vaccine. fauXi et al want those sections left in because they are extremely cytotoxic and the gp 120 goes straight to the brain with the jab within something like an hour. Those 4 HIV proteins work together: it's all malign synergy. The FCS is important for a bunch of reasons, and one of the modifications for the jabs is to enrich that site with extra G-Cs. When the cleavage happens all this bad stuff can happen better. Awesome catch on Dormitzer statement in 2016. I was my county prosecutor, have done criminal defense and more, so that's mens rea, that's willful and knowing misconduct, it's beyond negligence.
That paper with Senoff, McCullough et al talks about what that enrichment does to alter all these different cascades - another genius deliberate stroke - and the functioning of the quadraplexes. Enriching also sneaks the mRNA/spikes past the immune system/IFN-1 and then it effs the IFN-1 cascades all up and takes out the P53s that chew up cancer stuff. Until SARS2 HIV was the most glycosylated virus and that is what let HIV sneak past the early warning alarms. I ran into a paper last week - where they did 3D molecular mimicry for two areas of the spike and identified all these proteins that are crucial in important cascades, and they *humanized* them. There's also one that is from Timothy hay! Here it is - please, if you would take a look at Table 1 and 2. Talk about elegant engineering... Horrific, but elegant. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.10.455737v3.full.pdf
Dang, I'd love to talk with you about all this stuff. I catch myself talking to the video as you guys go along because the ground you are covering is fascinating. I am amazed how you have taught yourself to read all those sequence frames fluently. Dang.
And you've seen how they want to do this omicron jab mixed with the Wuhan - because the omicrons have the prion/amyloid promoting sequences silenced? Putting Wuhan in it ("a bivalent vaccine" - catchy phrase, grrr.) restores that horrible prion/amyloid promoting area. Anyway, I'll go finish watching and taking notes. So glad! you post here, on twitter and do what you do. Thank you! You are making much difference in the battlescape.
I appreciate your kind words.
My secure email is chrixey@protonmail.com. I agree; I think an outside perspective could be beneficial
Will do. TY.
The paper by Gallagher and Garry, 2003 that you mentioned might be memory holed. Going to the article on the journal's website results in an error. Could be a coincidence?
W.R. Gallaher, R.F. Garry, Model of the pre-insertion region of the spike (S2) fusion glycoprotein of the human SARS coronavirus: implications for antiviral therapeutics, Virology (2003) http://www. virology.net/sars/s2model.html.
I confirm that the link is broken to me as well.
A related article cites it with:
"In analogy to HIV-1 gp41, N-HR and an aromatic-rich region in SARS-CoV S2 protein were identified by Gallaher & Garry [11]. "
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1471-2180-3-20
I have archived it here: https://0x0.st/ofIh.zip
[EDIT] fixing the URL to Gallaher does show an october 2003 capture here: http://web.archive.org/web/20031002074634/http://virology.net:80/sars/s2model.html
And placed a .zip backup of the page here https://0x0.st/ofls.zip
Question: does the presence of homology in SARS-CoV to HIV-1 elements indicate natural origin? Did the GoF on SARS-CoV-2 not include introducing HIV elements but perhaps just enhancing them?
Responding to your question about the homology of SARS to short HIV elements: I have not studied the papers, but understand from a Charles Rixey podcast, link follows, that one way scientists were trying to identify potentially useful antigenic elements of HIV for universal neutralizing antibody production, was to insert HIV elements into other virus genomes creating a pseudovirus. This seems like proper research to me and one benefit would be working with a much less dangerous virus. A question is whether this research was then used to make a more dangerous SARS virus.
Rixey thinks it was. For example, the literature suggests that the furin cleavage site is from HIV gp120 and that the furin site is one of a number of HIV homologous elements identified in SARS-CoV-2. Criticism of the paper "Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag" included that the sequence homologies were too short to be significant. That is only accurate if those elements actually are insignificant and I do not know that the critics made any effort at empirical evidence for their dismissive claim. Looking at the HIV elements in the 3D structure of the SARS-CoV-2 folding spike trimeric protein, it appears that the HIV elements are in the critical recognition domain, the cleavage domain, and the fusion domain. This topic needs research by scientists looking for data and interpreting it away from politics.
https://rumble.com/v1bup6t-charles-rixey-gigaohm-biological-high-resistance-low-noise-part1.html
I think the relevant information on HIV-SARS pseudovirus particles was at or beyond the halfway mark in the video linked above. I'm pretty sure it was in part 1. Part 2 is also on Rumble.
Edit: I just realized that Charles Rixey is the author of this article. Hehe. Good work, Mr. Rixey.
Thank you very much for your response. I did read the 'Uncanny similarity' paper and thought, based on it, that SARS-CoV-2 was the first SARS with HIV homologies.
If Gallaher 2003 is correct about SARS-CoV(1) homologies with HIV, then we might want to look into evidence for GoF work on SARS before 2003.
I do know Baric was doing this stuff before then, so that is not impossible, right?
The homology Gallaher focused on in 2003 mostly referred to the region of the fusion peptide; Gallaher had discovered the nature and function of the HIV-1 fusion peptide in 1987, and helped to build a 3-tiered classification system to differentiate between the various viruses and investigate the usefulness of the homology with fusion peptide inhibitors, which he and Shibo Jiang [and later Robert Garry] were important in the development of. It's certainly clear that Gallaher was not enamored with vaccines, especially for coronaviruses, which might've been a strike against him already when he published his book full of therapeutic recommendations.
As far as a comparison with SARS, it was capable of infecting immune cells, too, but not by way of high homology with key residues from the variable loops on the gp120 region of HIV-1. One of the many possible rabbit holes still to be explored is whether the original SARS-CoV was manipulated prior to the 2002-2003 outbreak, but the evidence is much weaker than for SARS-CoV-2.
For example, the fact that SARS-CoV-2 interacts with ACE2 & Furin & TMPRSS2 & DC-SIGN/CD209 & thus CD4+ & also has more than ORF that can suppress the interferon responses means that it is capable of infecting a range of different cell tissues and quickly replicate before your immune response kicks in. This is absolutely the worst possible combination, because the odds of a cytokine storm exponentially increases, and if you survive your immune system is degraded while the hypoxia and furin have triggered cancer cells and amyloid fibril buildup.
InMyOpn, i can't read any of the text on that rumble linked video. Is there high quality video of the conversation (part 1 and 2)? I cannot find one on the usual sites.
It's like search is broken -- or something.
I do not know of a higher resolution video. I do have a copy of the New Deli paper before it was withdrawn from the preprint server.
Might be good to put the pdf or html .zip on https://0x0.st or somewhere. I think I have it lying around somewhere also but not sure.
There was also that great medium.com article real early on giving reasons for lab origin.
Also check out the 'jabs vs "covid" deaths' graph i did from CDC data. https://0x0.st/of8m.png
Here's a better version of the video:
https://vimeo.com/734902604/5627c0ecc1?embedded=true&source=vimeo_logo&owner=138322784
The pre-print of Pradhan et al is still available on bioRxiv, but you have to scroll a little to see the link to the original version.
A better version is available on ResearchGate; I'd drop the link myself but I'm short on time these days.
JC posted a better quality version in his archive, finally....lol
https://vimeo.com/734902604/5627c0ecc1?embedded=true&source=vimeo_logo&owner=138322784
Yes, the selection and construction of the HIV inserts in the SARS-CoV-2 genome follows the general methods used for today's mosaic, multi-clade and conserved epitope strategies with HIV vaccines [these strategies are applied to other virus vaccines as well, but the fact that
-three of the four inserts sit at the most accessible locations of the N-Loops on the SARS-CoV-2 virus and come together to allow access to T-cells,
-while providing glycosolation for protection
-AND greatly increasing the hydrophobicity of their respective areas,
-AND don't get in the way of ACE2 processes
-AND come from different clades/continents, akin to multi-clade HIV methods,
-AND have seen an abnormally rate of mutation in the direct vicinity of the inserts
-AND only appear in three other virus strains ever identified - all three of which may be previous 'steps' in the process of adding in inserts by Chinese scientists,
makes the odds of such inserts being natural worse than those of my Cowboys to win the Super Bowl this year.
Yes!
A lot of y'all newbies need to check out things we've been uncovering long before 2020. Didn't go down the 9/11 rabbit hole yet? Hmm. Lots of misdirection there too, but only one truth.
The rumble video is BADELY DEGRADED. Resolution 284x160! We need at least 720p video to have a chance at pausing and reading what you pull up on screen!
Did you upload a 160-line resolution video Charles, or did Rumble degrade it?
If you have it in reasonable quality please upload to Kevin McCairn's server, thank you.
Amazing discussion with Dr Couey. I thought I couldn't be saddened by this stuff anymore, but you outlined the malice so clearly. You've done great work for all people.
Love the sword too! 🗡️
https://robertchandler.substack.com/p/cdcfda-safety-evaluation-in-pregnant