COVID Consensuship 101: If you fabricate it, they will come
Or, how to gain 100k Twitter followers in 10 days
Gaslight of the GODS, part VIII
Last month, my fellow unraveler, Paul Thacker, pointed out a humorous statistical anomaly while providing some constructive criticism to a scientist heavily involved in the counter-factual defense of a natural origin for the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Specifically, he pointed out the meteoric rise in social media stature of Angie Rasmussen, who until recently had been a virologist at Columbia University in New York City:
Before the pandemic had even been declared, or even entered the consciousness of most Americans, Rasmussen arose from obscurity thanks to exponential growth in her twitter followership and a string of early media appearances as a subject-matter expert as the world woke up to the threat of a novel coronavirus spreading in Wuhan, China. Returning Prometheans can probably guess what happened next - I decided to do some digging to see what other oddities might pop up, in keeping with my vast collection of censorship data and analyses just waiting for a jury to share them with.
I found further evidence…
-I’ve got some outlier nuggets for you, Paul-
In early 2020, select Twitter accounts were boosted so much, so quickly, that the Twittersphere was overwhelmed by proponents of a certain COVID origin narrative. This activity was so big and so blatant that I literally picked the first names that came to my mind and …
I first checked out Trevor Bedford, whose militant squashing of debate around the Pradhan et al paper - the day after it first posted on bioRxiv. This was incredibly disingenuous, because that same day [1/31/2020], Bill Gallaher posted his own 80-page book on virological.org which highlighted the high homology [similarity] between the HIV env/gag complex and the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Further, the Internet Archive shows that Bedford was active on that message board during the two days after Gallaher first mentioned the furin cleavage site [FCS] on 1/29/2020, and he couldn’t NOT have known about the importance of the PRRA [or any CS] at the S1/S2 junction.
What I now know is that someone seems to have been grateful for Bedford’s efforts, because at that same time, his follower numbers unexpectedly began to explode:
Bedford wasn’t alone, however. Apparently, whomever boosted his reach simultaneously gave little nudges to several NYC-area virologists, like Florian Krammer:
Both Angie Rasmussen [as mentioned earlier] & Vincent Racaniello joined the party from Columbia. As I continued to look at other scientists within certain circles, it became clear that there was a systematic elevation of certain voices that began even before COVID-19 was called COVID-19:
In order to illustrate the scale of this boosting, I added DRASTIC’s combined followership in red [DRASTIC, of course, is the group of scientists & researchers investigating the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, that I’ve been a part of since February 2021].
Although our membership has slightly adjusted from time to time, the red line represents the total of approximately 20 members. For the last 12 months, there’s been a couple of periods of exponential growth followed by obvious de-boosting of our member’s profiles and content [and yes, I am tracking this as well]. The Glenn Beck special I co-wrote for BlazeTV managed to garner a million views for its non-subscription version on YouTube, despite not being listed in the drop-down search results when you attempt to search for it on that platform:
There’s obviously a hunger for the truth, and there’s obviously a selection of vested interests eager to prevent that truth from emerging. The problem with this censorship is that it comes with a cost - there’s a price we pay for the things they hide from us - and that cost is becoming more and more apparent with each passing day.
Take, for instance, the existence of the FCS within the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus; the cabal of scientists led by Anothony Fauci [USA] & Jeremy Farrar [UK] intentionally suppressed awareness of the existence of the FCS in late January-February 2020, despite knowing that the FCS was the primary characteristic that made SARS-CoV-2 a pandemic level-virus:
Suppressing the FCS meant not warning doctors & nurses of the high risk of transmission, during a time when such information could have drastically reduced the scale and speed of the growth of the pandemic.
My recent ResearchGate paper, The Myth of the Blind Watchmaker, compiles the evidence showing show how Fauci’s targeted suppression of two features - the FCS and the HIV inserts - directly impacted both the early trajectory of the pandemic [the FCS] and our current fight against “long COVID” [the HIV inserts]. In fact, the push to hide this connection continues, as the NIH is still refusing to fund research into the cause and manifestations of “long COVID,” and it’s easy to see why.
The questions everyone should ask themselves are:
-Why would anyone seek to hide the most virulent & pathogenic elements of the virus?
-WHO could possibly think that such actions were justifiable?
-What could be so damning to warrant the social media boosting of random virologists to Joe Rogan levels, in order to control a narrative about the origin of a pandemic virus?
-Why would the NIH ignore long COVID when doctors of all political persuasions are sounding the alarm about its dangers?
I’ll leave these questions as rhetorical - after all, if I don’t, this article will get censored, too.
If this doesn't prove out the theory that Twitter is 90% bots I don't know what does. It certainly shows someone was guiding Twitter through this process in who to elevate into "expert" positions in order to shape the narrative.
Pulling the thread of their addiction to being noticed. What a great way to begin to unravel the mysteries and corruption! Brilliant.