For the version with Slovakian subtitles,

click here to see the original tweet.

*..but I won’t turn down donations via subscription.* Every donation means another spike protein of justice, riding a lipid nanoparticle across the blood-brain barrier of the bureaucracy.

[*in my fight against the mortgage mandate]

SUBSCRIBE NOW, for free or otherwise. Alternatively, if you despise the shackles of Substack’s limited subscription options, you can donate any amount you want via Paypal @SARSCoVRix

and/or

Share

Version 9.0 of my SARS-CoV-2 Origin Reference Resource Project is on ResearchGate.

~~~~~~~~

~In August, I was honored to be one of the speakers at the Vejon Health Post-Vax/Long Covid Conference, alongside Stephanie Seneff, Christie Grace, Kevin McCairn, Shankara Chetty and more.

In the lead-up to the conference, I was fortunate to also be able to connect with Dr. Ryn Cole as well, though he ended up not being one of the speakers.

This initial conference, with 12 speakers each given 15 minutes, will be followed by multiple follow-on events that focus on a single topic with a couple of speakers.

I was asked to speak about SARS-CoV-2 and gain-of-function research within the context of Long COVID - because my research into epitopes of interest in my Watchmaker hypothesis leads directly to the immuno-dysregulating/neurodegenerative/oncogenic impacts of those epitopes - which are collectively referred to as “Long COVID.” In examining the goals of GOF work and the historical context of bioweapons research, we can come to see some of the logic behind the construction of the virus - and more importantly, we can have a better understanding of how to address the long-term sequelae of COVID-19 infections.

Video Link: Streamyard

Link to presentation PDFs: click here

Timecodes DAY 1

0:00
2:45 Intro from Joachim Gerlach
9:13 Intro from Christie Grace MSc - (Biotech Process and Project Manager)
Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) Concerns, Charges, Mutations, Plasmids, and Adverse Events
25:45 Post speaker questions Christie
36:52 Presentation from Kevin W McCairn - The SARS-COV-2 Spike Protein: An Engineered PRION Like Incapacitating Agent
1:00:20 Post speaker questions Kevin
1:07:58 Presentation Charles Rixey MBA - SARS-COV-2 & PASC/Long Covid through the prism of Gain of Function Research
1:29:28 Post speaker questions Charles
1:37:40 Presentation Dr Shankara Chetty
2:03:43 Post speaker questions Shankara
2:09:34 Presentation Dr Mannan Baig - Long Covid and the Road to Recovery
2:34:56 Post speaker questions Mannan
2:38:20 Round table talk
3:08:44 Closing points

Stay safe and enjoy the holiday weekend. Happy Thanksgiving!

~Rixey

*..but I won’t turn down donations via subscription.* Every donation means another spike protein of justice, riding a lipid nanoparticle across the blood-brain barrier of the bureaucracy.

[*in my fight against the mortgage mandate]

SUBSCRIBE NOW, for free or otherwise. Alternatively, if you despise the shackles of Substack’s limited subscription options, you can donate any amount you want via Paypal @SARSCoVRix

and/or

Share

Version 9.0 of my SARS-CoV-2 Origin Reference Resource Project is on ResearchGate.

~~~~~~~~

Tonight, Dr. Kevin McCairn and I will be discussing a range of important topics related to whether or not SARS-CoV-2 is a biological weapon, viruses can sustain transmission, and of course the schism regarding Dr. Jonathan Couey’s infectious clones argument.

It’s long past time to dig into the actual evidence - and then apply it to positive ends.

Link: Biowarfare Hypothesis Examined - Rounding the Earth Round Table w/ with Dr Kevin McCairn, Charles Rixey [stream will be live at 9 pm EST]

Below is a selection of images that will be useful references while watching/listening:

This last graphic, which looks at SARS-CoV-2 through the prism of the 7 categories of gain-of-function experiments - as laid out in US government policy - should figure prominently into the discussion.

A lot more is coming soon.

Happy Thanksgiving,

~Rixey

*..but I won’t turn down donations via subscription.* Every donation means another spike protein of justice, riding a lipid nanoparticle across the blood-brain barrier of the bureaucracy.

[*in my fight against the mortgage mandate]

SUBSCRIBE NOW, for free or otherwise. Alternatively, if you despise the shackles of Substack’s limited subscription options, you can donate any amount you want via Paypal @SARSCoVRix

and/or

Share

~~~~~~~~

Version 9.0 of my SARS-CoV-2 Origin Reference Resource Project is on ResearchGate.

This morning, I joined Kevin McCairn, PhD and Mary [PhD] in a discussion about the evidence for sustained airborne viral transmission of SARS-CoV-2 [streamed on Rumble].

For more about aerosol transmission, a good starting point is my article from two years ago:

Einstein's mistake, Redux: COVID-19 as a Paradigm Shift

~Rixey

*..but I won’t turn down donations via subscription.* Every donation means another spike protein of justice, riding a lipid nanoparticle across the blood-brain barrier of the bureaucracy.

[*in my fight against the mortgage mandate]

SUBSCRIBE NOW, for free or otherwise. Alternatively, if you despise the shackles of Substack’s limited subscription options, you can donate any amount you want via Paypal @SARSCoVRix

and/or

Share

~~~~~~~~

I just uploaded version 9.0 of my SARS-CoV-2 Origin Reference Resource Project to ResearchGate.

For more background information regarding this project, see my post from the last update:

Prometheus Shrugged

The Arc of Inquiry bends towards Enlightenment - The SARS-CoV-2 Origin Project

I’ll never mandate paid subscription* *..but I won’t turn down donations via subscription.* Every donation means another spike protein of justice, riding a lipid nanoparticle across the blood-brain ba…

Read more

4 years ago · 64 likes · 18 comments · Charles Rixey, MA, MBA (c)

The section with the most new material and tabs is “Evidence of Unnatural Origin,” which includes a tab that lay out the key research articles that directly lead to a virus just like SARS-CoV-2, and shows the connections between the labs of various countries and how they worked together to make new discoveries along the way. I’ve also provided tabs which lay out the suspicious elements of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, the mutations which have occurred in the vicinity of those suspicious elements, comparisons of those suspicious elements with known or potential bio-weapons, and a complete list of all BSL-4 labs where [ostensibly] such experiments would be taking place:

I’ll repeat my project’s hypothesis as well:

I will end with the list of principles that I’ve adhered to while compiling this list over the last 2.5 years:

*It’s important to point out that I’ve never added links to articles I’ve not read - one of my primary motivations has been to provide an accurate, relevant and unbiased collection of information, so that it might be useful to everyone regardless of their own personal views about where the SARS-CoV-2 virus came from. This includes ~131,000 pages of FOIA documents, which is about 85% of the total released to date.

My principles for this project:

-Provide links to all relevant sources covering each major hypothesis, regardless of my own personal leanings

-Ensure that the sources are relevant; reading each item prior to adding it to the collection means that I can provide an intelligent explanation, should anyone have questions about my editorial decisions.

-In particular, since one of my main areas of research has been scientific censorship, I feel a burden to set an example that can’t be credibly attacked for engaging in similar types of narrative control.

~Rixey

Today I'm in Boston, attending Robert F. Kennedy Jr's official announcement of his presidential campaign. As a long time conservative with libertarian leanings, it's certainly the first time that I've ever found myself at an event like this.

However, almost exactly 1 year ago, on April 15th, I received a phone call from RFK in which he asked me to help expose the injustices perpetrated by Anthony Fauci and others during the COVID-19 pandemic. I proudly served as a consultant supporting those efforts.

This article was first published last June, but its message is even more relevant today. I'm here in Boston because I know why RFK Jr is fighting against the bureaucracy and I also know personally how hard he is willing to fight to see justice obtained. As I told him last year,1 I know how rare courageous leadership is. I know that his actions against Fauci, and now in this campaign, show that he has the courage to fulfill the challenge that his uncle (JFK) put forth to a different generation in 1961.

~Rixey

The older I get, the wiser John F. Kennedy appears in retrospective.

A week ago, this article sat ready to be published when I decided to watch President Kennedy’s two speeches again. JFK’s Inaugural speech from January 1961 & his “Moonshot” speech from September 1962.

A year ago, this was my son’s history lesson for the day, but I would offer it here for a different reason. John F. Kennedy's inaugural speech hearkens back to a time when hope seemed eternal, and America was at its peak. As stark as the contrast between 1961 and today might seem, life has taught me that the only difference between any generation is the courage and hope of its leaders and citizens. If our leaders will not lead, then the answer is simply that we must do it ourselves.

In 1961, most segregation was still in effect, nuclear tension was about to peak, Russia beat us into space and the Berlin Wall cut Berlin in two pieces. And yet, Kennedy didn't spur us into action with guilt and shame - he told Americans that there was a lot to do and told us to get started.

What? The President of the United States said WHAT?

You may want to sit down.

That’s correct; President Kennedy told Americans to stand up and sacrifice. We weren’t even in a war. We weren’t even in a recession. The youngest man ever elected president stood up in his first minutes as president and told a bunch of Depression survivors and World War II/Korean War vets that it was time to work harder. In fact, a year later, he told Americans to suck it up, because he wanted Americans to land on the moon by the end of the decade!

I realize that these statements are painful and non-inclusive, but history is important.

What justification did President Kennedy give for this stupendously ambitious aim, one that would cost billions of dollars, and achieve very little for the 99%? [It’s important to point out that at the time, the Soviet Union had just put the first human into space, and the US was behind in the space race]. His justification was

"Not because it is easy, but because it is hard.”

I reject the idea that our country or our people are any less capable of leading the world than in 1961. I spent the last two years unemployed/working pro bono, and I've watched more than a million Americans die even as I prayed that my predictions wouldn't come true.

More than anything, my son needed to know that the response to tragedy must be resolve, not resignation. Oswald's bullets killed Kennedy, but it didn't have to kill his vision for our country. We did that on our own, but we don't have to repeat that history again, because hope and courage are far more contagious than a virus, and our kids deserve to see that in us.

June 6th

John F. Kennedy’s assassination on November 22nd, 1963 foreshadowed a dark period that sank the US into its greatest challenges since World War II and the Great Depression that preceded it. The COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath represent the next great challenge for our country, and today there is no shortage of naysayers who predict that the United States has begun its period of terminal decline. We would do well to listen to the men who led us through those prior dark periods.

Our leaders of the 1960’s didn’t preach pessimism, despite the deep divides in our society. Martin Luther King, in his last speech before his assassination on April 4th, 1968, reminded us that what was coming was worth the sacrifice:

That same evening, Robert F. Kennedy spoke in Indianapolis, Indiana, and broke the news to the crowd gathered at one of his campaign stops [in the 1968 Democratic primary, during which he was the frontrunner]. He echoed the visions of his brother and of MLK, despite his own personal experience of having had his brother assassinated five years earlier:

“We can do well in this country. We will have difficult times. We've had difficult times in the past. And we will-we will have difficult times in the future. It is not the end of violence; it is not the end of lawlessness; and it's not the end of disorder. But the vast majority of white people and the vast majority of black people in this country want to live together, want to improve the quality of our life, and want justice for all human beings that abide in our land.”

I will never allow my son to grow up in a world in which he hears me disparage America, its founding principles, its history of sacrificing for the freedoms of others, and its profound impact for good upon the history of humanity. That doesn’t mean that I will hide America’s blemishes. I’ve always been honest about the failures, the evils and the injustices which, throughout our history, have prevented America from always living up to its own lofty ideals. What I reject is the notion that our failures are ALL that we are.

Besides, he could turn on a hundred channels if he wanted to hear others talk about why America is a failure.

Memorial Day and June 6th [the anniversary of D-Day, the landings on Normandy Beach in World War II] always spark memories of my grandfather, who died in 2006 while I was in Iraq. Two weeks before I deployed, I visited him for the last time, and during that visit he passed down his Mameluke sword [USMC officer’s sword], that had been passed down him by his father in early June, 1944, right after he graduated from the Naval Academy and just before he left for the Pacific theater; my grandfather ultimately landed in Okinawa as part of the invasion force there.

However, a week ago, I discovered something else which took place on June 6th, in 1968; just two months after Martin Luther King, Jr., Robert F. Kennedy was assassinated as he celebrated his victory in the California Democratic primary. Bereft of its likely nominee, the Democratic party suffered through a contentious convention and lost to Richard Nixon that fall.

And yet, despite the turmoil of the 1960’s, before the decade ended the United States had fulfilled the promise made by John F. Kennedy in 1962, landing 3 astronauts on the Moon in the summer of 1969. Americans didn’t give up because the challenges were too great, nor did we succeed because we’d conquered all other problems that arise out of the human condition. We simply refused to quit.

That’s the lesson I wanted to teach my son - that being a virtuous man doesn’t mean being a perfect one. It means to do what must be done, for the right reasons, regardless of what others may say or do. America sacrificed more than 400,000 men to defend the freedom of others in World War II, fighting a war largely in the other hemisphere.

I’ve sought to set that example during the COVID-19 pandemic, because I know that that is what must be done; the task is no different just because the fight is closer to home. I said the same thing in my very first article in April, 2020. I have no doubt that the same basic understanding is what fuels the efforts of our front-line doctors, DRASTIC and the son and nephew of two of the men mentioned above, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. It’s clear that he learned the same lessons I was fortunate enough to receive from the ‘Greatest Generation.’

It is time to fight back against the violence of institutions. America has seen its share of tragedy, but it need not be defined by it. If JFK, RFK & MLK refused to accept it, then I see no reason why we should.

Not because it is easy, but because it is hard.

~Rixey

1

Anthony Fauci famously said that the lab-origin ‘conspiracy theory’ was a “shiny object that will go away in times.:”

Well, since Sunday will be the 3-year mark since his prediction, help me celebrate with Substack’s new Notes feature:

Notes is a new space on Substack for us to share links, short posts, quotes, photos, and more. I plan to use it for things that don’t fit in the newsletter, like work-in-progress or quick questions.

I’ll try to include as many nuggets of wisdom from my tweets as well…

Go to Notes

How to join

Head to substack.com/notes or find the “Notes” tab in the Substack app. As a subscriber to Prometheus Shrugged, you’ll automatically see my notes. Feel free to like, reply, or share them around!

You can also share notes of your own. I hope this becomes a space where every reader of Prometheus Shrugged can share thoughts, ideas, and interesting quotes from the things we're reading on Substack and beyond.

If you encounter any issues, you can always refer to the Notes FAQ for assistance. Looking forward to seeing you there!

Go to Notes

-The leading global public health officials knew SARS-CoV-2 bore the hallmarks of engineering/manipulation

-They specifically suppressed all ties pointing to this truth, to protect themselves

-The collateral damage from these decisions was massive, and continues as ‘long COVID’ & other sequelae

-The conclusions that follow are supported by evidence regardless of whether the virus is natural or not - or who made the SARS-CoV-2 virus, or why.

The Myth of the Blind Watchmaker argument centers upon the response to the ‘novel’ virus

[A direct video breakdown that follows the same order can be found within this stream, from 2:03:00 - 3:05:30]

I am a member of DRASTIC,

Last fall, I signed an affadavit with 4 others,1 submitted to each state's attorney general.

I will soon provide testimony under oath in support of grand jury proceedings to hold US and international officials & organizations responsible for actions taken before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, which constitute crimes against humanity.

This post lays out many of the conclusions formed through my research.

The ‘Watchmaker’ argument in this document summarizes the evidence and implications of Dr. Anthony Fauci's scientific censorship, narrative control and obstruction of justice upon the initial expansion and ultimate scale of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the collateral damage which was knowingly inflicted upon the American citizens he swore an oath to protect. Ultimately, it provides evidentiary support for why Pradhan et al was so viciously attacked, what it was that Fauci and Jeremy Farrar et al sought to hide [the Furin cleavage site and significant SARS-CoV-2 – HIV genomic homology] and how enforcing those decisions led to tragic consequences for humanity.

My findings and conclusions on Fauci’s scientific censorship, the similarities between the SARS-CoV-2 genome & epitopes from prior vaccine designs, and how these threads interconnect are based on several thousand hours of individual research. Most of the findings related to the HIV inserts in general, gp120, the furin cleavage site [FCS] and other aspects of the SARS-CoV-2 genome are the product of those listed above, or others referenced in the endnotes.

The implications are profound, and profoundly disturbing; the scale of the response to the 1^st & 2^nd drafts and livestreams [#2] have clearly shown me that my intuition about their importance was correct. I’ve published them here, now, because the evidence has become so overwhelming that I can’t, in good conscience, withhold these conclusions from the public.

Major conclusions of the 'Watchmaker' hypothesis:

-        Dr. Fauci & others knew, based upon the suspicious elements of the SARS-CoV-2 genome, that the virus had almost certainly been manipulated; they knew that such manipulations likely came from chimaeric/pseudovirus & insertion techniques very familiar to US & Chinese viral vaccine & therapeutic/MCM programs.2

-        The 2/1 teleconference hosted by Fauci & Jeremy Farrar was convened specifically in response to the publication of the Pradhan et al pre-print and the growing awareness of the furin cleavage site [FCS].

-        They immediately took steps to censor and control public & scientific discussions related to the HIV inserts and FCS, respectively; these actions are more properly viewed as obstruction of justice.

-        Many of the scientists implicated in Fauci’s gain-of-function [GOF] research or the pandemic origin cover-up were also involved in earlier origin-narrative efforts for HIV-1, Gulf War Syndrome3 & the 2014 Ebola epidemic in West Africa, including 4 of 5 authors of “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2.”

-        Beginning on 2/3/2020, President Trump's science advisor and OSTP director, Kelvin Droegemeier, worked with Fauci to withhold information about US GOF research ties with the WIV from the Trump administration.

-        This had major implications for both the early response to the pandemic [FCS], ongoing treatment protocols, and the long-term impact on global public health [the HIV inserts & ‘Long COVID’ sequelae/antibody class-switching, etc].

The Early Response - Protecting the legacy, not the public’s health

-        Dr. Fauci & his Vaccine Research Center [VRC, with Moderna] finished their vaccine prototype on 1/13/2020,45 and knew of the FCS one week before human-to-human transmission was confirmed by China. Thus, they knew that the virus was infectious enough to cause a pandemic – yet took steps to suppress this information for two months – until they could control the narrative via "Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2." The 2/1 teleconference attendees authored 33 papers/articles during that same two-month period, never mentioning the FCS. These actions intentionally enabled the largely unhindered spread of COVID-19:

-        Dr. Fauci and his VRC's decision to retain the FCS within their vaccine prototype goes against more than two decades of HIV, Flu,6 RSV and coronavirus vaccine research and development practices; I went through 49 vaccine studies to confirm this trend:

-        HIV-1 like elements in the SARS-COV-2 genome are very similar in form and function to current HIV vaccine templates [Conserved epitopes, mosaic, consensus, multi-clade, etc.] EXCEPT that the 'bad' parts were retained [the FCS, prion-like domains, DC-SIGN receptors, etc]. Once again, these are antithetical to modern vaccine design:

-        For these and other reasons, the SARS-CoV-2 virus does not appear to be a failed vaccine prototype [Live Attenuated Vaccine/LAV, etc].

-        Dr. Fauci & most global public health officials ignored aerosol transmission, even after the disappearance of the flu & failure of lockdowns/masks. Their actions may have fueled the rise and impact of the Delta variant.

-        Dr. Fauci actively worked to suppress any links between SARS-CoVs & HIV-1, including a class of drugs Robert Garry & Bill Gallaher had helped invent – fusion peptide inhibitors. He blocked many other proven or promising treatments as well, like hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin D, protease inhibitors, and antibiotics.

The Collateral Damage - Reaping what Fauci has sown

-        The SARS-COV-2 genome is mutating at unnatural rates in precisely the areas of the suspicious inserts - exactly what you would see in a virus attempting to return to its natural state [Part of Montagnier & Perez's argument, elucidated by Fleming, now born out undeniably]:

-        The immune isotype IgG4 class-switching that has emerged within vaccinees who received mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccinations is very similar to effects seen in certain previous HIV vaccine trials; the HIV-like inserts within SARS-CoV-2 resemble parts of the gp120 protein in HIV, which drove the unusual IgG4 responses in that earlier trial.

-        Broad immune-suppression, especially amongst the vaccinated, is now fueling exponential rises in early and/or fast-onset cancers & amyloid neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s & Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease.

-        The combined immune-dysregulation effects of furin, DC-SIGN, ENaC & the SEB-like superantigen motif may also explain how SARS-CoV-2 can spread via aerosol transmission. The unprecedented & consecutive overlapping of the SEB/FCS/ENaC elements exponentially increases SARS-CoV-2’s ability to infect human lungs.

-        Many of the features listed above have direct ties to historical bioweapons research, in the US and abroad. Superantigens including SEB were stockpiled as part of the US offensive bioweapons program until its closure by President Nixon in 1969.7 Furin Cleavage Sites are even more ubiquitous, in all the wrong places/viruses:

-        The FCS, HIV-like inserts, immune dysregulation and chimaeric viral construction were four key features that were described as project goals within the DEFUSE proposal that EcoHealth Alliance submitted to DARPA in March 2018. Neither Dr. Fauci nor the US intelligence community disclosed this proposal in testimony or in the “Biden Report” on the origin of SARS-CoV-2; they covered up what is in fact proof of intent to produce a virus much like the one that caused the COVID-19 pandemic:

These conclusions indicate that the potential human cost8 of Dr Fauci's pandemic decisions to suppress information about the FCS and other inserts may exceed that of President Franklin Roosevelt's decision to call for declarations of war against Japan and Germany in World War II.9

Without hesitation, I will testify under oath to the veracity of the evidence in support of these conclusions. They involve implications that are horrific regardless of which scientists, from which country, may have been responsible for creating SARS-CoV-2; [their] actions constitute crimes against humanity. I propose the list of questions that follows on behalf of the victims of the COVID-19 pandemic, who cannot ask them themselves. I promise you, however, that all of them are waiting to hear the answers.

Semper Fidelis,

Charles H. Rixey

“We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark. The real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light.”
― Plato

Share

Subscribe now

This remains my only source of income, so… I’ll never mandate paid subscription*

*..but I won’t turn down donations via subscription.* Every donation means another spike protein of justice, riding a lipid nanoparticle across the blood-brain barrier of the bureaucracy.

[*in my fight against the mortgage mandate]

SUBSCRIBE NOW. Alternatively, if you despise the shackles of Substack’s limited subscription options, you can donate any amount you want via Paypal @SARSCoVRix

1

4

5

6

“We DO NOT make flu vaccines with that motif…” [YouTube clip]

*..but I won’t turn down donations via subscription.* Every donation means another spike protein of justice, riding a lipid nanoparticle across the blood-brain barrier of the bureaucracy.

[*in my fight against the mortgage mandate]

SUBSCRIBE NOW, for free or otherwise. Alternatively, if you despise the shackles of Substack’s limited subscription options, you can donate any amount you want via Paypal @SARSCoVRix

and/or

Share

I’m back, literally and figuratively.

My sabbatical, in part, was meant to provide some time to focus on finishing the actual “watchmaker” document - a task that was made much harder by the non-stop emergence of additional evidence and new lines of inquiry during a very busy winter. The 7-page summary from May is now more than 100 pages, since the purpose of this final version is to lay out the evidence for each conclusion in a fully-linked format:

To give you an indication of why this has been such an extensive process, I can start by pointing out that the list of main conclusions in the preface has grown from 4 to 17 - all of which tie back to Dr. Fauci’s decision to hide the existence of four small inserts within the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, and prevent public awareness of their implications:

We don’t need to know the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to know the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The ‘watchmaker’ argument in this document summarizes the evidence and implications of Dr. Anthony Fauci's scientific censorship, narrative control and obstruction of justice upon the initial expansion and ultimate scale of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the collateral damage which was knowingly inflicted upon the American citizens he swore an oath to protect.

In the last 9 months, the emerging evidence has continued to add weight to the arguments that led Robert Malone to show the livestream recording JC & I did on 4/9/2022 to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Senator Ron Johnson. When the former called me and offered me a job [assisting on certain projects] and the latter called me and offered me encouragement, I didn’t know what to do other than to keep digging, lol.

I’ve kept digging, and the pile of evidence has kept on growing; for better and worse, each time new revelations arise in the origin-verse, I’ve quickly discovered the hanging chads that point right back at Mr. “Science” and his crop of collateral damage. Each conclusion is backed up by ~10 to ~60 sources, because my main goal isn’t to stand on the Substack street corner and preach to the converted - my main goal is to present my evidence to a jury, and/or a Congressional inquiry.

That being said, the evidence and conclusions I’ve been compiling and correlating ultimately belong to all of us, just as the justice I’m fighting to gain; that’s why it’s time for me to escape Appalachia [the Smoky Mountains] and get back to making the case here on Prometheus Shrugged again.

A lot has changed in the last few months, and as far as Twitter is concerned, it’s changed for the better. I’ve been very active within the Twitter Spaces, including a 6-part series that I co-hosted with EcoHealth Alliance whistleblower Andrew Huff. The Thanksgiving interview we did with Wikileaks funder/free speech advocate KimDotCom ultimately garnered more than 170K listens - almost as many as KimDotCom’s next interview four days later, with Elon Musk.

• Twitter Spaces 11/28/2022 - Kim DotCom w/ Andrew Huff and Charles Rixey - Origin of COVID-19 / Genetic Engineering

• Twitter Spaces 1/29/2023 - COVID in the courtroom: Legal perspective & strategies; Whistleblowers, Doctors & Lawyers

• Twitter Spaces 2/4/2023 Dr. Martin, Dr. Fleming, Geoff Wexler / Patents, Legal Paths & More

• Twitter Spaces 2/5/2023 COVID Origin - the PANDA Space 

Monica Mathews 6-part Twitter Space series with Andrew Huff

• Twitter Spaces 1/16/2023 - Why COVID was made I - Biowarfare/Pandemics

• Twitter Spaces 1/20/2023 - Why COVID was made III [Charles Rixey]

• Twitter Spaces 1/23/2023 - Why COVID was made IV [Andrew Huff & Charles Rixey]

• Twitter Spaces 1/25/2023 - Why COVID was made V [Huff, Hoffman & Rixey]

• Twitter Spaces 1/27/2023 - Why COVID was made VI [Huff, Rixey & Renz]

GigaOhm Biological Livestreams - Twitch

• GigaOhm 7/15/2021 - Gigaohm Special Report: DRASTIC report with Charles Rixey

• GigaOhm 1/2/2022 - DRASTIC Livestream I - Fauci, the FCS & things to come

• GigaOhm 2/23/2022 - DRASTIC Livestream II - In depth discussion of 19nt w/in the big picture

• GigaOhm 2/28/2022 - DRASTIC Livestream III - Wuhan epid. & refuting Worobey

• GigaOhm 4/9/2022 - DRASTIC Livestream IV - Gallaher, Garry, & Fusion Inh.

• GigaOhm 4/26/2022 - DRASTIC Livestream - DMED Data with Mathew Crawford

• GigaOhm 5/28/2022 - DRASTIC Livestream V - The full 'Watchmaker' argument

• GigaOhm 7/4/2022 - DRASTIC Livestream VI - Further discoveries, including the HIV inserts through the lens of HIV vaccine research

Doc McCairn - Rumble

• McCairn 7/17/2021 - Patient Zero in Wuhan - Charles Rixey & Kevin McCairn - Timeline / Location analytics

• McCairn 9/4/2021 - I discuss CFR concerns - Gigaohm Biological/Dojo dual livestream

• McCairn 11/8/2021 - Mccairn Dojo 🦝 & C. Rixey - D.R.A.S.T.I.C. - DEFUSE, Aerosol Transm, etc.

• McCairn 1/11/2022 - 🦝 The Dojo 🦝 - C. Rixey & Brandy Lou Aftermath FM

• McCairn 4/3/2022 - Ep 138.1: Lab Origin panel- Dr Johanna Dienart, Housatonic, Rixey, Nick, Kevin McCairn

• McCairn 9/25/2022 - SARS Insurgency - Roundtable with Walter Chesnut, Mathew Crawford, Johanna Deinert, Jessica Rose, JC Couey, Spartacus, Nick St. John & Charles Rixey

• McCairn 11/8/2022 - Next-Gen Warfare With Charles Rixey

• McCairn 11/9/2022 - Next-Gen Warfare With Charles Rixey (pt 2)

• McCairn 11/22/2022 - Latest SARS FOIA With Charles Rixey

• McCairn 12/4/2022 - Taking A Stand? (Pt 2) With Charles Rixey

• McCairn 12/8/2022 - SARS Biowarfare With Charles Rixey

• McCairn 12/22/2022 - Charles Rixey - The Republican House Committee Report

• McCairn 1/11/2023 - De-Facto Biowarfare With Charles Rixey

• McCairn 1/23/2023 - Reports From The Bio-Warfare Front With Charles Rixey

• McCairn 2/4/2023 - Charles Rixey - The Problem With Clones

• McCairn 2/6/2023 - NATO Child Soldiers? Shaheeds, WEF Pandemic Accounting

• McCairn 2/7/2023 - Giga-Spiral Part 2 - The Purity Test Gatekeeper Edition

• McCairn 2/9/2023 - Giga-Spiral 3 - Clones & Exosomes w/Charles Rixey

• McCairn 2/14/2023 - Spartacus & Rixey - COVID-19: The Biodefense Mafia

• McCairn 2/17/2023 - Charles Rixey - A Forensic Look at Worobey's et al, Failure in Wu-Chang (rumble.com)

• McCairn 2/28/2023 - The Lab "Leak" Press Conference With Charles Rixey (rumble.com)

Other Assorted Appearances

• Out of the Blank podcast 6/11/2022 - Episode 1130 - Charles Rixey - the Origins and Insanity of the COVID-19 pandemic

• Out of the Blank podcast 8/4/2022 - Episode 1179 - Rethinking Pandemia: Roundtable with Norman Fenton, Charles Rixey, David Livermore & David Bell

• Rounding the Earth podcast 8/23/2022 - SARS-CoV-2 Origins - Round Table w/ Charles Rixey and Jonathan Couey

• TNT Radio 9/27/2022 Clyde Lewis [TNT Radio] - Dr. McCairn & Charles Rixey discuss the current state of the COVID-origin story

• TNT Radio 11/10/2022 - The Bryan McClain Show COVID Censorship w/C. Rixey

I’ve also got 3 more appearances in the next 24 hours:

Li-Meng Yan 3/2/2023

SomeBitchIKnow 3/2/2023

Out of the Blank 3/3/2023

~Rixey

*..but I won’t turn down donations via subscription.* Every donation means another spike protein of justice, riding a lipid nanoparticle across the blood-brain barrier of the bureaucracy.

[*in my fight against the mortgage mandate]

SUBSCRIBE NOW, for free or otherwise. Alternatively, if you despise the shackles of Substack’s limited subscription options, you can donate any amount you want via Paypal @SARSCoVRix

and/or

Share

~~~~~~~~

I recently uploaded version 8.0 of my SARS-CoV-2 Origin Reference Resource Project to ResearchGate, and although it’s my 8th update in the last 18 months, most of my readers probably need an introduction to it, since I haven’t really mentioned it here in over a year.

In short, it’s a free, public collection of information, links, timelines and evidence, all focused on various aspects of the ‘mystery’ of where the SARS-CoV-2 virus came from - nature or …. somewhere else.

[Note: the Excel file on Research Gate is public and free for anyone to download; my only request is that if you find it useful for your own research, cite the file so that awareness of its existence can grow]

The project started as just a published version of the list of references I found useful as I began studying the origin mystery back in May 2020; at that time, I was mostly focused on analyzing case/death and other epidemiological data from the first waves of the pandemic:

I quickly realized that if I was struggling to keep track of all of the different mysteries surrounding the origin of the pandemic, there were probably other curious individuals out there who could also benefit from having access to a living, breathing spreadsheet of resources and links.

I even came up with a hypothesis about what sort of information might be gleaned from such a project:

Over time, I added tabs for a broad range of topics, and over the course of two years it has continued to grow in breadth and depth.

In April of 2021, I started using a color-coding system to designate which authors/papers were arguing for a natural origin or for a lab origin, and quickly realized that it made it much easier to see the censorship & narrative dynamic which had been employed to flood “the literature” with only one side of the argument:

*It’s important to point out that I’ve never added links to articles I’ve not read - one of my primary motivations has been to provide an accurate, relevant and unbiased collection of information, so that it might be useful to everyone regardless of their own personal views about where the SARS-CoV-2 virus came from. This includes ~131,000 pages of FOIA documents, which is about 85% of the total released to date.

My principles for this project:

-Provide links to all relevant sources covering each major hypothesis, regardless of my own personal leanings

-Ensure that the sources are relevant; reading each item prior to adding it to the collection means that I can provide an intelligent explanation, should anyone have questions about my editorial decisions.

-In particular, since one of my main areas of research has been scientific censorship, I feel a burden to set an example that can’t be credibly attacked for engaging in similar types of narrative control.

Speaking of narratives & biases, the chart below depicts where publishers of the 1,928 articles fall on the natural origin - lab origin spectrum [the chart and the underlying data can be found in tab 13 of the Excel workbook]:

Tab 28 contains a list of the most-read origin articles across all types of written media:

Which also highlighted the stunning impact of Fauci’s censorship of the top scientific publications. Of the top 56 articles [20,000 or more reads], Lab-leaning articles account for 66% of the articles but only 0.6% of academic citation [378 vs. 62,857].

For those who may be wondering how I can justify linking Fauci to various editorial decisions, know that I do not do so without justification - I’ve become intimately familiar with the credentials, ties and output of scientists who’ve been working with Fauci, Jeremy Farrar and others to suppress parts of “the science:”

And, of course, I’ve become intimately familiar with those that oppose such efforts, like my fellow members of DRASTIC:

There’s also a timeline of the censorship:

& one with all of the relevant FOIA releases, and links to articles that explain what of importance can be found within each release:

I couldn’t possibly introduce each of the 49 tabs in a single Substack article, but my hope is that curious readers will check it out and potentially find it useful. It’s the largest single project I’ve worked on during the pandemic, since it has been used for all of the other areas I’ve investigated, and the work of compiling it and keeping it updated is even less sexy than the 2.5 months of reading FOIA documents for several hours a day [and taking and editing hundreds of screenshots for a compilation I put together].

When I joined DRASTIC 2 years ago, I didn’t have expectations of making my own discoveries,1 and so my focus was simply on trying to assist the effort in any way that I could. Most of the things I did ultimately discover were only found because I’d become so familiar with the research and evidence while doing the grunt-work early on.

Yes, it’s frustrating to know that our own federal government employs tens of thousands of taxpayer-funded analysts whose actual jobs include doing the research myself and others have been doing - pro bono - for more than two years. It’s also quite clear to me that this situation is unlikely to improve in the near future - which means that if we’re going to have a future worth living in, we must build it ourselves. For me, that starts with obtaining a measure of justice for the millions of victims of this pandemic, because if we can’t obtain justice for millions of dead, innocent victims, then the prospects for the rest of us aren’t very good. As I told KimDotCom a few days ago:

~Rixey

Subscribe now

1

*..but I won’t turn down donations via subscription.* Every donation means another spike protein of justice, riding a lipid nanoparticle across the blood-brain barrier of the bureaucracy.

[*in my fight against the mortgage mandate]

SUBSCRIBE NOW. Alternatively, if you despise the shackles of Substack’s limited subscription options, you can donate any amount you want via Paypal @SARSCoVRix

Subscribe now

Yesterday, with about 15 minutes’ notice, I joined Andrew Huff on a Twitter Space for an interview/discussion with KimDotCom, a tech entrepreneur/internet free speech advocate who was a primary supporter of Wikileaks, which has made him persona non grata to the US government.

It turned out to be an excellent discussion that covered a lot of new ground, especially at that level of public awareness - KimDotCom has a very active 1 million Twitter followers, and after 24 hours there’s already been 300,000 listeners of the recorded Space.

I highly recommend you listen and share as widely as possible; my current understanding is that you don’t even have to have a Twitter account to listen to the recording, so I hope that’s true. The discussion has a slightly different feel to it, since it was being hosted by someone from outside the usual COVID-origin cadre, but I’m confident you’ll appreciate the change in pace.

I feel our momentum continuing to grow. I know from experience that when you’re consistently hitting the target, the best thing you can do is keep pouring it on…..

“Everything starts as a speck of dust. Someone has to do it. If we are that speck of dust, so be it.”

~Rixey

Share

Many readers may be wondering if this article’s subtitle is hyperbolic - simply meant to attract attention; after all, 407,000 American troops were killed across our 4-year contribution to the largest armed conflict in the history of mankind.

It’s not an exaggeration - in fact, it’s probably an understatement.

The central hypothesis I’ve been working on for most of 2022 is laid out in The Myth of the Blind Watchmaker [Research Gate pre-print article] and expanded upon/updated in Gaslight of the Gods, part VII: The Allegory of the Plague.

In short, I’ve compiled and connected evidence that explains why Dr. Fauci exerted so much effort in censorship from the very start of the pandemic, what it was that he worked so hard to suppress, and how horrific the collateral damage has been - and continues to be.

Share

On Tuesday, a new batch of FOIA emails was released, which contains nothing but further evidence in support of my standing conclusions. Once again overlooked are the arrows pointing towards the importance of the Pradhan et al paper [the infamous 'Indian pre-print'], which was released on BioRxiv on 1/31/2020 - the day before Anthony Fauci & Jeremy Farrar’s famous 2/1 teleconference/cabal in which a dozen leading scientists expressed concerns about the potential lab-origin of SARS-CoV-2 [and thus the potential lab-origin of what became the COVID-19 pandemic].

Instead of just covering a few new tidbits of information - and partly because I want to show my readers the latest findings first - I decided to place the newest FOIA nuggets within their proper “Watchmaker” context and provide a more structured, hard-hitting overview via Dr. McCairn’s stream/podcast.

The best places to start and stop would be 41:56 to ~3:09:00, and I’d recommend listening to it at 1.25 speed. There’s a lot to process, but it’s hard to imagine anyone coming away from this big-picture summary of the current, actual evidence with the feeling that the World War II comparison isn’t justified.

Here's a link to the video on Rumble, since YouTube deleted it.....

https://rumble.com/v1wjsuj-latest-sars-foia-with-charles-rixey.html

Semper Fidelis,

~Rixey

Subscribe now

*..but I won’t turn down donations via subscription.* Every donation means another spike protein of justice, riding a lipid nanoparticle across the blood-brain barrier of the bureaucracy.

[*in my fight against the mortgage mandate]

SUBSCRIBE NOW. Alternatively, if you despise the shackles of Substack’s limited subscription options, you can donate any amount you want via Paypal @SARSCoVRix

~~~~~~~~

On September 20th, 2021, my group DRASTIC released our analysis of the DEFUSE proposal, which showed that EcoHealth Alliance/China/UNC had at least the intention of creating chimaeric coronaviruses which contained furin cleavage sites [FCS], the ability to efficiently infect immune cells via DC-SIGN [a la HIV] and the ability to dysregulate humans’ interferon responses, which can allow a virus to slip past your body’s immune system.

On October 20th, 2022, other scientists found evidence that the structure of the SARS-CoV-2 virus follows a pattern of chimaeric construction never found in nature - and invented by one of the primary investigators of the proposed DEFUSE grant.

If you’ve been wondering what’s kept me so busy lately, you can partly blame my co-authors on the article below, published on the CHD website, that explains what this latest discovery might tell us about the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic:

In my September 28th post, I introduced you to a scientist named Alex Washburne, whom I’d met last winter and had recently jumped into the origin fight with both feet. He and two other scientists, Valentin Bruttel & Antonius van Dongen, just published a paper describing how they discovered evidence of a reverse genetic engineering technique that was previously thought to leave no trace of manipulation in a virus’s genome [Endonuclease fingerprint indicates a synthetic origin of SARS-CoV-2] - and they found it within the virus that caused the COVID-19 pandemic.

There’s much more to come, so sit tight and buckle your seat belts.

~Rixey

Share

-Polls are skewed, largely by design

-A majority of polls are commissioned specifically to skew aggregate results

-This tells us far more about those who seek to control the narrative than it does about the actual election outlook, and the problem is magnified [on purpose] in our current era of censorship

Perhaps we should be less focused on a poll's results, and more focused on a poll's purpose

The image above depicts polling results from 237 separate polls that asked the question [with slight variations] ‘Which party’s candidates are you most likely to vote for, if an election were held today?’ 237 is the sum of all such polls since the beginning of August 2021, as compiled by RealClearPolitics; I chose that particular cutoff point because it would cover everything from just prior to the American withdrawal from Afghanistan [when the Biden administration’s approval numbers first began to sink] up to the present.

I compiled and analyzed these poll results because they provide a stark example of how a single data-set can be [and often is] manipulated to suit a particular narrative purpose - which has been taken to historic extremes since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Readers of Prometheus Shrugged - especially those who’ve been around for more than a few months - should be familiar with the argument that censorship and narrative control have been applied during this pandemic to an unprecedented degree. As an American, these efforts have been so unconstitutional and so broad that they literally became my impetus for moving to Substack in February 2021 - a transition that started when FaceBook rejected the following image because it went against their standards by “inciting violence:”

Prometheus Shrugged

Silence is Consent: Censorship, Voter Suppression & the Concealment of Context

This is a personal statement for my friends and family, from me (Charles Rixey). It is original; nothing has been cut or pasted, and you won’t have bad luck if you decide not to send it to 12 people …

Read more

6 years ago · 1 like · Charles Rixey, MA, MBA (c)

-That article was originally a FaceBook post [retroactively placed here on Substack].

Ever since early 2020, when my very first pandemic commentaries were being written, I’ve sought to highlight the bizarre disconnect between published data/analyses and what the actual conclusions should’ve been:

Prometheus Shrugged

COVID-19: The Schrodinger's Cat Crisis

Once I grew up and read about Schrodinger’s Cat, I found it quite amusing. It’s a great way to explain the randomness of subatomic particles, even if it’s hard to grasp the implications at first. The…

Read more

5 years ago · 1 like · Charles Rixey, MA, MBA (c)

Which brings us to the dichotomous reporting on polling data, and why it’s important to understand the difference between registered voters [RV] and likely voters [LV]. Per polling organization Gallup:

Here, Gallup points out the obvious - that polls based on registered voters will be less accurate than polls based on likely voters - because likely voters are more likely to vote.

It’s important to clarify that I added the bold accents to that last statement on purpose - not to insult my readers’ intelligence, but to highlight that this, in essence, is exactly what many news organizations are doing when they drive entire news cycles on the basis of polling data that they know are flawed at best.

Comparing RV & LV

The first odd data point is the overwhelming preponderance of RV-based polls [183 to 54], despite the known weaknesses in RV data as accurate predictors of election outcomes. I don’t have enough time to point out all of the historical evidence that supports this conclusion, so we’ll take Gallup’s word for it at the moment.

Next, let’s consider what the trends look like when separated [RV first, then LV]:

Both charts depict rolling averages, of 5 or 3 polls, respectively [due to the disparity in total number of polls], but the overall conclusion is that the 6.2% difference in polling average that I showed in the very beginning represents a very different baseline in voters’ party preference between RV and LV, at any given point on the timeline. Given that LV data will always be expected to be closer to reality, the best way to explain the impact of over-loading the data with RV samples is simply to say that the aggregate average will be skewed towards the partisan leanings professed by all registered voters - with the added proviso that not at states require registered voters to profess a party preference, even when voting in partisan primaries.

The current RealClearPolitics generic congressional polling chart would look very different if the lines were shifted to account for the massive difference between whatever RV datasets are being used when selecting prospective voters to be polled. Comparing the following chart to the ones above makes the impact on the overall average obvious:

Size Matters

Returning to the overall numbers introduced at the start of this article, there’s another outlier that sticks out - the average sample size for each of the two categories:

When I calculated the correlations between each data point [shown in a moment], the size of the sample in a given poll wasn’t a major factor, but there’s more than meets the eye, in my opinion. Among all LV polls, there were only 4 in which Democrats earned a greater share of support, and only poll had a tied result:

Moreover, ALL 3 Democratic-leaning LV polls that published their sample size were within the 6-smallest of 51 LV samples [and the 4th was 1 of the 3 unpublished-sample polls]:

In other words, as a pollster’s random sample of voters grew larger and more likely to vote, the shift towards a preference for Republican candidates was significant, and this shift remained largely consistent throughout the 14-month period.*

[*the very first dataset went all the way back to February of 2021 but only added 4 additional polls, which were excluded from the deeper calculations; the “ord” column numbering began in Feb]

Cui Bono?

The logical thing for any reader to do at this point would be to ask why? - Why would any polling firm - or any organization paying for a poll - intentionally choose a methodology that they know will produce inaccurate/skewed results?

After all, the constant theme we’ve heard after each of the last few election cycles has been that polls overestimated the Democratic share of the actual electorate [except in 2018, when there was a major ‘wave’ for Democrats at the mid-term point for President Trump], or that various other mysterious factors must exist that explain who actually votes. In the aftermath of the 2020 election, Scientific American managed to blame everything but the relationship between RV’s and LV’s.

Yet somehow, the 2022 election approaches and very little has actually changed amongst pollsters, despite a decade’s-worth of statistical dumpster fires that should’ve produced a tangible amount of soul-searching and formula-tweaking by now.

There is, however, a stunningly obvious answer:

The overwhelming majority of modern polling isn’t conducted in order to provide an accurate picture of what to expect in upcoming elections; the primary purpose of most polling is to OBSCURE the truth and SHAPE the public’s perceptions about the state of politics in the United States.

I’m not concerned about readers collapsing in shock at that statement, of course. The shift towards dueling narratives in our modern media environment is obvious to anyone who has reached middle school [my 8th-grade son has confirmed this].

What IS surprising is that this narrative control remains effective - especially since early 2020, when censorship truly became a weapon of the largely left-leaning ‘establishment.’ This has exacerbated the impact of all narrative efforts, by reducing the public’s access to information that conflicts with the ‘accepted’ truth - using ‘the science’ as a Trojan horse.

[I don’t make such claims lightly - I do so having spent two years chronicling facets of that censorship. Here’s a handful of my articles on this topic, from the last year: The Sword of D’Omicron, Manufactured Consensus, The Architects of COVID-19 Consensuship, Anti-Science - The Guardians of the Fallacy, The Sound of Science]

Sometimes, trends can be explained by innocent ignorance, but we can probably rule out at least part of the polling results from such innocence. I added gray highlights to each poll result that differed from LV results by more than 8 percentage points within 48 hours before or after the LV results were published. All but 1 such poll was RV-based, and most of them came from a single pollster:

The most common question I’ve heard others ask as I’ve investigated the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic is “cui bono” - ‘who benefits?’

It’s time to look beyond mere partisanship to answer that question; however, my focus remains on the answer to the opposite question - who loses?

When it comes to censorship, the answer is

all of us

~Rixey

Share

Subscribe now

P.S. For the curious…

I cannot recommend following and supporting him enough; he is a scientist with courage and integrity - incredibly rare, as you know.

I leave you with my comment I left on his post:

“Although I was introduced to you out of the blue last winter, it only took me a few minutes to realize that your curiosity and your concern regarding the pandemic and its impacts were genuine.

Integrity and courage have been shockingly rare during the pandemic, as I know from first-hand experience. Knowing that this article is rooted in those values makes its message even more important for others to hear.

Thank you for saying what needs to be said.”

The host, Robbie Robertson, dropped the four of us into an unstructured panel where we could complain about all things COVID.

I was the outlier, as the other three panelists are all scientists from the UK, but all of us agree that everything about this pandemic was a disaster.

My fellow panelists were:

Norman Fenton - Professor of Risk Information Management, Queen Mary University of London; a mathematician and a well-known skeptic of public health practices during the pandemic.

David Livermore - former Professor of Medical Microbiology at the University of East Anglia [UK]

David Bell - Head of Malaria/AFS at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics; also part of PANDA, a non-profit pandemic data/analysis group

You can listen to the episode via the embedded audio link below, or watch it via the Spotify app on your computer or device.

As you can see, I managed to stay busy even as I was packing.

~Rixey

Share

never mandate paid subscription*

*..but I won’t turn down donations via subscription.* Every donation means another spike protein of justice, riding a lipid nanoparticle across the blood-brain barrier of the bureaucracy.

[*in my fight against the mortgage mandate]

SUBSCRIBE NOW. Alternatively, if you despise the shackles of Substack’s limited subscription options, you can donate any amount you want via Paypal @SARSCoVRix

The Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan was the early epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic | Science

The molecular epidemiology of multiple zoonotic origins of SARS-CoV-2 | Science

At some point, I’ll write an article that details the specifics of why those papers are wrong - and the authors know it - but for now, I just want to highlight some of the evidence that disproves their assertions.

I should point out that the conclusions from my analysis are from more than one hundred [130+, technically] sources - most of which have never even been addressed by the authors of those two papers, which includes 3 of the 5 authors of the Fauci-commissioned “Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,” the infamous study that Fauci used to claim that a “consensus” of scientists agreed that the virus came from nature, not a lab.

But, I’ll save those details for later.

These are two good summaries of the data, at different times in my investigation. Well worth the listen, I promise.

Dr. McCairn's Livestream from 7/18/2021 - The 1st Deconstruction

Prometheus Shrugged

Wuhan's House of Cards: the outbreak of COVID-19, in context

*Note — My current focus is researching COVID-19’s origins, as part of the D.R.A.S.T.I.C. team of scientists, journalists & researchers. Recent news: D.R.A.S.T.I.C.’s research forms a large portion …

Read more

5 years ago · 2 likes · Charles Rixey, MA, MBA (c)

Prometheus Shrugged

Wuhan's House of Cards, part II: The Devil's in the Details

*Note — My current focus is researching COVID-19’s origins, as part of the D.R.A.S.T.I.C. team of scientists, journalists & researchers. Recent news: D.R.A.S.T.I.C.’s research forms a large portion …

Read more

5 years ago · 1 like · Charles Rixey, MA, MBA (c)

~Rixey

Share

never mandate paid subscription*

*..but I won’t turn down donations via subscription.* Every donation means another spike protein of justice, riding a lipid nanoparticle across the blood-brain barrier of the bureaucracy.

[*in my fight against the mortgage mandate]

SUBSCRIBE NOW. Alternatively, if you despise the shackles of Substack’s limited subscription options, you can donate any amount you want via Paypal @SARSCoVRix

Subscribe now

*..but I won’t turn down donations via subscription.* Every donation means another spike protein of justice, riding a lipid nanoparticle across the blood-brain barrier of the bureaucracy.

[*in my fight against the mortgage mandate]

SUBSCRIBE NOW. Alternatively, if you despise the shackles of Substack’s limited subscription options, you can donate any amount you want via Paypal @SARSCoVRix

Subscribe now

JC & I combine for another stream with Mathew Crawford, with this encounter taking place on his new “Rounding the Earth” podcast, an offshoot of his Substack of the same name.

Some topics covered:

*Explaining how Fauci had to know about the furin cleavage site far earlier than anyone realized

-Why the FCS matters, and how it enhanced the SARS-COV-2 virus’s ability to become a pandemic-level virus.

-How the FCS interacts with the immune system

-The suppression of fusion inhibitors and some science behind them

-Surveillance in China

-How fusion inhibitors might be employed

-How these details fit in with the current state of the pandemic

Rounding the Earth

Share

Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one less traveled by,

And that has made all the difference.

~Robert Frost

I’ve been busy

On August 4th, we closed on the sale of our house, which had been our home for the last four years in the northern suburbs of the Dallas-Fort Worth ‘metroplex.’

I had to sell it (before its foreclosure date), but thanks to the hyper-inflated housing market, we were able to make a solid profit. That's good, but even if it had been foreclosed on, it wouldn't have changed what I was going to do. No matter what I was going to keep researching the origin of the pandemic, and that decision was made 18 months ago.

I realize that some people will read that and question my sanity, but I'm not insane. My decision was one of priorities - our world is currently a raging dumpster fire, and the best thing I can do to protect my family is figure out who sparked the inferno.

A logical follow up question would be “Okay, but why does it have to be You that investigates COVID'S origins?” After all, I'm not a scientist, an FBI agent or even a WMD Marine (my former career).

The answer, as was made clear to me by congressional investigators last year, is that there is nobody else doing what DRASTIC is doing; they learned of Fauci's ties to censorship from me, before his emails had been released.

I didn’t take it as a compliment - I took it as a horrifying sign that significant portions of our government have no interest in discovering the truth of the origin of this virus. In fact, the opposite is true - the entire intelligence community withheld their awareness of the existence of the DEFUSE proposal - even though it explicitly described the intent of EcoHealth Alliance, Ralph Baric of UNC & the Wuhan Institute of Virology to conduct the exact genetic manipulations and passaging experiments necessary to produce the exact features found within the SARS-CoV-2 genome.

What the I.C. authors of the “Biden Report” didn’t know when they presented their intelligence summary on the origin of the pandemic virus to President Biden on 8/25/2021 was that I already knew about the DEFUSE proposal, and I was waiting to see if they’d actually be honest in their report. They lied, of course, and as Project Veritas later reported, a copy of the DEFUSE documents had been found on the Top Secret JWICS server - during the 90 period in which the “Biden Report” was being generated.

That’s the reality of what we’ve endured during this pandemic - the continuous betrayal of the institutions that we were told to trust. What’s worse is that all of those institutions exist because our taxes pay for them; in the case of the intelligence agencies, the total is more than $91 billion.

The NIH budget is $40 billion…

I’m fully aware that the notion of having to sacrifice years of my life to do something that we pay 107K intel employees and 18K NIH employees to do is, in any functioning reality, absurd. I’m also fully aware that that is the reality we are faced with.

direct link to the video

The first half of the stream is also available on Rumble, and the whole thing is available in better resolution on Vimeo. However, if you only have time for a portion of it, then part 2 is more important.

Why? Because as hard as I’ve worked to discover evidence and build a picture of the crimes against humanity that we’ve endured during the pandemic [a rough list of my personal discoveries/projects/analyses in support of DRASTIC’s origin investigation is pictured below], I know that the fight is far from over.

As I sit here writing in the last few minutes of September 11th, 2022, it’s impossible not to reflect upon the last 21 years, and how things have changed since that Tuesday morning. As a 17 year-old college student, I remember sitting in front of a TV in the student lounge for several hours; roughly an hour into my vigil, the first of the Twin Towers collapsed, and I knew in that moment that my life would never be the same.

The pandemic has been different, however - you’d have to repeat the attacks on September 11th, 2001 every day for a year to match the scale of the pandemic. The kicker is that all-cause mortality is still rising, and our leaders in power are openly pressing to stay on the same course.

This is why I’m now back in Virginia, staying with my in-laws - because someone’s gotta do it.

~Rixey

Prologue – The Sword of D’Omicron; I – The DARPA/Project Veritas leak; II – Manufactured Consensus; III – The Architects of COVID-19 Consensuship; IV – Anti-Science - The Guardians of the Fallacy; V – The Myth of the Blind Watchmaker [Watchmaker 2.0; topical bibliography]; VI – The Sound of Science; VII – The Allegory of the Plague

“If a ray of light falls into a pigsty, it is the ray that shows us the muck and it is the ray that is offensive.”

Ayn Rand, The Fountainhead, 1943

VII: Allegory of the Plague

For 18 months, I’ve been working to uncover the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, as a member of the ad-hoc investigative team DRASTIC; during that time, I’ve researched several different facets of the mystery and read several thousand scientific articles [& ~150k pages of FOIA documents]. The emerging trend I’ve seen is that most of the various threads are starting to converge and flow in one main direction, and it’s time to stop pushing against the current simply to cover up the truth.

It’s time to step back, look at the big picture, and lay out the COVID origin case as it currently stands; one of the main reasons my publishing record has been fairly sparse since April is that I keep finding more and more evidence every day, and thus there’s never a good stopping point. However, it’s also way past time to provide a concise, cohesive narrative, so that awareness & momentum can build to begin holding our officials accountable for what’s occurred.

The majority of what follows is an abridged version of the arguments laid out in The Myth of the Blind Watchmaker, which is an entirely different [and far more comprehensive] document than the one I published as Part V of Gaslight of the Gods back in April [the livestream describing our most recent findings, from July 4th, can be found in two parts on Rumble: part I & part II]. The reason is because the volume of evidence is more substantial, and the potential implications are disturbing.

The argument:

We don’t have to find the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to find the origin of the pandemic.

That argument may sound strange, but the point is that enough evidence already exists to show that Dr. Fauci and others took deliberate actions and made decisions that were in opposition to their statutory responsibilities. Furthermore, there are two reasons to start now, not after the next election:

[1st] - Sufficient evidence already exists to compel testimony to gain answers, and there’s no indication that Fauci et al will cooperate in any way without a subpoena.

[2nd] - More and more Americans will continue to suffer the effects of the pandemic every single day that vital information is withheld from the public.

None of the evidence that has emerged since I first described these four elements has undercut the assertions:

We can further condense the Watchmaker arguments down to:

A) We now know that they recognized how unnatural the SARS-CoV-2 virus looked, right from the start.

B) We now know why this would’ve been obvious to the NIAID’s Vaccine Research Center once they received the genome on 1/11/2020.

C) We know that they targeted specific aspects of the suspicious genome to suppress within the scientific debate.

D) The decisions to censor the FCS & the other HIV inserts had major & deleterious impacts upon the early spread of the virus and upon our current efforts to understand & fight “long COVID.”

The real questions that Congress, the media or other scientists should be asking at this point - 2 and a half years on - are why they censored these elements [and still are], and why they retained these elements in their vaccines.

What follows is a summary of the evidence for arguments A-D mentioned above. Those who’ve read the full document since its last iteration was published on May 28th may wish to skip ahead to the final section, “Gaslight of the Gods.”

1 week to slow the spread [of uncomfortable narratives]: 1/29/2020 – 2/4/2020

On January 31st, 2020, an 80-page book titled Analysis of Wuhan Coronavirus: Déjà vu was published as a free download on Amazon’s Kindle service. This was the first English-language publication to discuss the existence and implications of the FCS [the only prior reference was a Chinese research paper published as a pre-print on 1/21/2020 to the ChinaXiv server]. Gallaher’s first mention of the FCS came 2 days earlier, in a 1/29/2020 post on the Virology.org professional message board.

Also on January 31st, a 9-page scientific article titled “Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag” was uploaded to the pre-print server bioRxiv. The authors, a group of researchers from India, listed a set of 4 short segments they’d discovered within the then-2019-nCoV spike protein’s genome that matched portions of HIV-1 – the virus responsible for AIDS.

That same day, Trevor Bedford [an expert in viral evolutionary dynamics] began tweeting in response to the paper’s claims [pictured below], and Anthony Fauci and Jeremy Farrar called for an emergency teleconference to be held the next day – 2/1/2020, a Saturday – with leading scientists & public officials from four countries. By Monday afternoon [2/3/2020], a second teleconference had been held, with GOF-implicated scientists, Trevor Bedford, Anthony Fauci, Tom Inglesby, Gigi Gronvall and more attending at the request of Kelvin Droegemeier, the Presidential Science Advisor for President Trump and the director of the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy; the stated purpose of the event was to “combat misinformation” surrounding the origin of the 2019-nCoV virus.

One of the speakers was David “Chris” Hassell, senior science advisor to Robert Kadlec, Assistant Secretary for Preparedness & Response [AS/PR] at the Department of Health & Human Services; Hassell was also the chair of the P3CO oversight committee created in 2017 to review gain-of-function research involving Potential Pandemic Pathogens. Together, this group reached the decision to construct a specific narrative, meant to silence any inquiries that might travel down a path that implicated many of the most prominent virologists and vaccinologists in the world.

“This is a tiny tiny sequence and in no way suggests engineering”

Trevor Bedford’s tweet [pictured above] of 2/1/2020 argued that “Insert 4 (QTNSPRRA) shares GTNS with the bat virus RaTG13, while PRRA represents unique material in #nCoV2019. This is a tiny tiny sequence and in no way suggests engineering.” It’s hard to overstate how disingenuous his statement was, especially since the internet archive shows that Bedford had been active on the message board during the period between Gallaher’s first post on 1/29/2020 and Bedford’s 2/1/2020 tweet.

The existence of the Furin Cleavage Site [FCS] couldn’t be suppressed, because its crucial role in increasing the infectiousness of respiratory pathogens was widely understood within the international scientific community. However, the existence of the FCS was not highlighted by any of the scientists or public health officials convened by Anthony Fauci and Jeremy Farrar on 2/1/20 until the final publication of “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” on 3/17/2020 – in which the potentially unnatural origin of the FCS was roundly rejected, and its relevance for infectivity [as compared to the ACE2 receptor] was minimized:

Much of what has been done to combat the pandemic – especially here in the United States – has been the opposite of what would’ve been recommended, if all of the information available to Dr. Fauci by February 1st, 2020 been publicly known. Collateral damage from the decision to withhold this information can be grouped into 6 primary topics:

As a reminder, the detailed lists of questions/evidence under each topic [with copious links] are all found within the Watchmaker 2.0 document, and a complete set of references for the project are within the topical bibliography. I did want to provide a small sample of the questions, just to give you an idea of the concerns arising from the published evidence that I’ve found thus far, that demand answers:

II - Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions [NPI] & Early Treatments

• *Why has the aerosol/airborne transmission of the virus been largely ignored by the WHO and most public health agencies?

• *Why did Anthony Fauci, BARDA, AS/PR push Remdesivir but not other anti-viral drugs; specifically fusion inhibitors, which had been invented in the US and showed strong potential in 2 decades’ worth of in silico in vitro & in vivo studies on Class 1 viruses including HIV-1/2 and CoV’s?

• *Robert Garry recently informed us that Vitamin D is critical for our T-Cell response, which is one of the bodily systems hit hardest during a severe COVID-19 infection. [Why didn’t Anthony Fauci et al ever recommend/include Vitamin D as a prophylactic/early treatment [or weight loss, exercise or healthier diets]]?

• *Why was Bill Gallaher’s note on the Chinese use of chloroquine [to block the virus from using endosomal entry, especially in the lungs] during the Wuhan outbreak never specifically addressed?

• *Why was Remdesivir targeted for approval for the treatment of late-stage COVID-19 infection, when its mechanism targets the virus itself – which has already inflicted its damage by that point in the infection? Ralph Baric & Mark Denison – who helped create and test it – reiterated this point in February 2020.

• *Some have suggested that SARS-CoV-2 is a Live Attenuated Vaccine [LAV] reverting to its original form, something seen with LAV’s with Dengue Fever. However, that makes no sense – why would China need an antidote [fusion inhibitors] for a vaccine/vaccine trial?

-Gaslight of the Gods-

When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, The Sign of Four, 1890.

The purpose of my “Watchmaker” argument was to:

-highlight the elements of the SARS-CoV-2 genome that appeared unnatural

-highlight the fact that Fauci & other scientists recognized the inserts & understood their implications

-show that they specifically targeted the FCS and the HIV inserts for suppression/censorship

-show that they continue to target scientific and public awareness and discussion of these elements, despite the impact to studies on long COVID and the origin of the virus itself.

In recent weeks, I’ve discovered further damning evidence in support of the hypothesis - portions of which were discussed during my July 4th DRASTIC livestream with Dr. Jonathan Couey [part I & part II].

The first additional key point is that The FCS has been specifically left unchanged in most of the developed COVID-19 vaccines, despite decades of against the standard practice of viral vaccine design for flu, HIV, etc:

This image is from the YouTube video of one of the gain-of-function study sessions in December 2014 - the week before the GOF ban/pause went into effect. The person sitting next to Ralph Baric is Philip Dormitzer, who at that time was the head of the vaccine development section of the biopharmaceutical company Novartis; he moved to take the same role at Pfizer the next year. Thus, he was still there in early 2020 when the decision was made to retain the FCS.

Some readers may pause at this point, and wonder if perhaps retaining the FCS was a mistake - something that was simply missed in the shuffle?

Thankfully, Moderna & the NIAID’s Vaccine Research Center [VRC] explicitly stated this for the record:

It gets worse, however.

You see, I’ve been troubled by Fauci’s decision to stay quiet about the existence of the FCS for more than a year. However, after reading two dozen articles which describe the construction of vaccines for coronaviruses, HIV & the flu, I surveyed the methods used to prepare & neutralize a virus for safe use as prophylaxis. Thus far, I’ve gone through 26 studies of prototype vaccines and only found 2 in which the Furin Cleavage Site was kept, unchanged, for the final product.

Those two are the Moderna/VRC and Pfizer mRNA vaccines in use today:

I should note that all of the current prototypes being studied for future use [that I’ve come across thus far] have returned to the pre-pandemic method of removing or changing the FCS.

Why did they keep it - and why have they reversed course?

We need to know why - Now.

Lastly, there’s one more vital point that the public needs to understand - Dr. Fauci and a few other senior scientists knew instantly that the discovery of HIV spike inserts within the SAR-CoV-2 viral genome made it almost impossible for the virus to be natural.

The first part of the evidence is the FCS itself, because that 12nt segment is part of 1 of those 4 inserts first highlighted by Pradhan et al on 1/31/2020. It’s the part that unequivocally couldn’t have come from a recombination in nature [as Ah Khan Syed explained so clearly & concisely here]. I feel confident that the other 3.5 inserts are just as artificial, but it’s only necessary to prove that ANY part of the virus is unnatural to nullify the natural origin hypothesis.

The second part arose from my reading of those two dozen studies pictured above.*

[*and another 282 articles related to CoV/HIV spike homology, fusion peptides and their inhibition, and prion/amyloidogenesis, etc. over the last six months - most of which are already linked within tab 23 of my reference resource]

The inserts follow an ENV*3[or 4]+ GAG*1 conserved epitope/mosaic structure [the QTQTNS…PRRA|R being the book-end pieces from a typical GAG motif]. This construct is a type arising from one of the two main HIV vaccine designs currently employed, and the fact that they sit in the exact physical positions on the SARS-CoV-2 spike to be most accessible and antigenic makes their appearance within the genome “incompatible with expectations from nature.”

This would've been well understood by the WIV or the VRC to reflect tinkering with the genome - because mixing elements of HIV-1’s spike protein with CoV sequences and/or backbones [or vice versa] has been part of the VRC’s HIV-1/CoV vaccine research since at least 2006 [at least 2007 for the WIV, and at least as recently as 2018]:

-For a fuller explanation on this point, watch the July 4th livestream on Rumble [part I & part II].

In short, it’s time to ask Dr. Fauci why he chose to suppress/censor awareness of the FCS and the other HIV-like inserts. The former exacerbated the early spread of the pandemic, and the latter is almost certainly the main driver of the Long COVID that is emerging in a double-digit percentage of symptomatic COVID cases [especially Long COVID symptoms associated with autoimmune and amyloid-driven disorders].

That’s the true legacy of Anthony Fauci – the implications of censorship of Intelligent Design

These questions are valid regardless of who created the SARS-CoV-2 virus, or for what purpose it was created. The magnitude of their implications is such that simply refusing to answer them should itself be considered obstruction of justice.

~Rixey

“We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark. The real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light.”
― Plato

Share

’ll never mandate paid subscription*

*..but I won’t turn down donations via subscription.* Every donation means another spike protein of justice, riding a lipid nanoparticle across the blood-brain barrier of the bureaucracy.

[*in my fight against the mortgage mandate]

SUBSCRIBE NOW. Alternatively, if you despise the shackles of Substack’s limited subscription options, you can donate any amount you want via Paypal @SARSCoVRix

Subscribe now

More excerpts of questions for Fauci from The Myth of the Blind Watchmaker: